Antes de empezar a investigar todo este movimiento , nunca hubiera dicho que habita tantas evidencias apuntando a un plano delante de mis narices. Es mas, ahora opino que hay muchas mas pruebas de que no es una esfera que precisamente de lo contrario. Supongo que no soy el único que ha sentido algo así durante el despertar.. son muchos años de adoctrinamiento tanto directo como indirecto, lo se! ,, pero no dejo de sorprenderme de como dia tras dia , nos meten el globo a todos por doquier.. Ahora, me fijo mucho mas en todo esto, me doy cuenta de en cuantos sitios insertan subliminalmente la esfera.
En esta entrada, voy a intentar resumir algunos puntos a los que creo que merece la pena prestar un poco de atención... No sin antes ver unos cuantos vídeos que sin duda hacen una gran recopilación de pruebas sobre el tema que se trata en este hilo..
Que tengas buen despertar!
La Tierra Plana 200 pruebas , por (Eric Dubay)
17 Motivos por los que razonamos que la Tierra es Plana, estacionaria y circular
(Hermanos Barea)
30 Pruebas de que la Tierra es Plana (Oliver ibañez)
25 Pruebas de que vivimos en una tierra PLANA Y ESTÁTICA (Terraplanistas Spain)
200 pruebas de que la Tierra no es una bola giratoria (Eric Dubay)
1) El horizonte siempre aparece perfectamente plano 360 grados alrededor del observador, independientemente de la altitud. Todas las imágenes de globos, cohetes, aviones y aviones no tripulados aficionados muestran un horizonte completamente plano de más de 20 millas de altura. Solo la NASA y otras "agencias espaciales" del gobierno muestran curvatura en sus fotos / videos falsos CGI.
2) El horizonte siempre se eleva al nivel del ojo del observador a medida que se gana altitud, por lo que nunca tendrá que mirar hacia abajo para verlo. Si la Tierra fuera de hecho un globo, no importa cuán grande, a medida que asciendes, el horizonte permanecería fijo y el observador / cámara tendría que inclinar la vista hacia abajo más y más para verlo.
3) La física natural del agua es encontrar y mantener su nivel. Si la Tierra fuera una esfera gigante inclinada, tambaleándose y atravesando un espacio infinito, entonces las superficies verdaderamente planas y consistentemente niveladas no existirían aquí. Pero dado que la Tierra es, de hecho, un plano plano extendido, esta propiedad física fundamental de la búsqueda de fluidos y el nivel restante es consistente con la experiencia y el sentido común.
4) Los ríos descienden hasta el nivel del mar y encuentran el curso más fácil, Norte, Sur, Este, Oeste y todas las demás direcciones intermedias sobre la Tierra al mismo tiempo. Si la Tierra fuera realmente una bola giratoria, entonces muchos de estos ríos estarían fluyendo cuesta arriba, por ejemplo, el Mississippi en sus 3000 millas tendría que ascender 11 millas antes de llegar al Golfo de México.
5) Una porción del río Nilo fluye por mil millas con una caída de solo un pie. Algunas partes del Congo del África Occidental, según la supuesta inclinación y movimiento de la bola-Tierra, a veces corre hacia arriba y hacia abajo. Este también sería el caso de Paraná, Paraguay y otros ríos largos.
6) Si la Tierra fuera una bola de 25,000 millas de circunferencia como afirman la NASA y la astronomía moderna, la trigonometría esférica dicta que la superficie de todas las aguas estancadas debe curvarse hacia abajo unas 8 pulgadas por milla fácilmente multiplicables por el cuadrado de la distancia. Esto significa que a lo largo de un canal de 6 millas de agua estancada, la Tierra se sumergiría 6 pies en cada extremo del pico central. Sin embargo, cada vez que se realizan tales experimentos, el agua estancada ha demostrado estar perfectamente nivelada.
7) A los topógrafos, ingenieros y arquitectos nunca se les exige que tengan en cuenta la supuesta curvatura de la Tierra en sus proyectos.Los canales, ferrocarriles, puentes y túneles, por ejemplo, siempre se cortan y colocan horizontalmente, a menudo a lo largo de cientos de millas sin ningún margen de curvatura.
8) El Canal de Suez que conecta el Mediterráneo con el Mar Rojo tiene 100 millas de largo sin ninguna cerradura, lo que hace que el agua sea una continuación ininterrumpida de los dos mares. Cuando se construyó, la supuesta curvatura de la Tierra no se tuvo en cuenta, se cavó a lo largo de una línea de referencia horizontal a 26 pies por debajo del nivel del mar, pasando a través de varios lagos de un mar a otro, con la línea de referencia y la superficie del agua corriendo perfectamente paralelas sobre Las 100 millas.
9) El ingeniero, W. Winckler, fue publicado en la revista Earth Review sobre la supuesta curvatura de la Tierra, afirmando: “Como ingeniero de muchos años en pie, vi que esta asignación absurda solo está permitida en los libros escolares. Ningún ingeniero soñaría con permitir algo por el estilo. He proyectado muchas millas de ferrocarriles y muchos más canales y ni siquiera se ha pensado en el subsidio, y mucho menos en lo permitido. Esta tolerancia para la curvatura significa esto: que es 8 ”para la primera milla de un canal, y aumenta en la proporción por el cuadrado de la distancia en millas; así, un pequeño canal navegable para botes, digamos 30 millas de largo, tendrá, según la regla anterior, un margen de curvatura de 600 pies. Piense en eso y luego, por favor, acredite a los ingenieros como no tan tontos. Nada de eso está permitido. No pensamos más en permitir 600 pies para una línea de 30 millas de ferrocarril o canal, que en perder nuestro tiempo tratando de cuadrar el círculo "
10) El ferrocarril de Londres y el noroeste forma una línea recta de 180 millas de largo entre Londres y Liverpool. El punto más alto del ferrocarril, a mitad de camino en la estación de Birmingham, está a solo 240 pies sobre el nivel del mar. Sin embargo, si el mundo fuera en realidad un globo terráqueo, curvando 8 pulgadas por milla cuadrada, el tramo de ferrocarril de 180 millas formaría un arco con el punto central en Birmingham elevándose más de una milla, un total de 5.400 pies sobre Londres y Liverpool.
11) Un topógrafo e ingeniero de treinta años publicado en el Birmingham Weekly Mercury declaró: “Estoy completamente familiarizado con la teoría y la práctica de la ingeniería civil. Por muy intolerante que algunos de nuestros profesores puedan estar en la teoría de la encuesta de acuerdo con las reglas prescritas, sin embargo, es bien sabido entre nosotros que tales mediciones teóricas son INCAPIBLES DE CUALQUIER ILUSTRACIÓN PRÁCTICA. Todas nuestras locomotoras están diseñadas para funcionar en lo que puede considerarse como NIVELES VERDADEROS o PISOS. Por supuesto, hay inclinaciones o pendientes parciales aquí y allá, pero siempre se definen con precisión y deben atravesarse con cuidado. Pero cualquier cosa que se acerque a ocho pulgadas en la milla, aumentando a medida que el cuadrado de la distancia, NO PODRÍA SER TRABAJADO POR NINGÚN MOTOR QUE SE HAYA FABRICADO. Tomando una estación con otra en toda Inglaterra y Escocia, se puede afirmar que todas las plataformas están EN EL MISMO NIVEL RELATIVO. La distancia entre las costas este y oeste de Inglaterra puede establecerse en 300 millas. Si la curvatura prescrita era realmente la representada, las estaciones centrales en Rugby o Warwick deberían estar cerca de tres millas más arriba que un acorde extraído de las dos extremidades. Si tal fuera el caso, no hay un conductor o fogonero dentro del Reino que se haga cargo del tren. Solo podemos reírnos de aquellos de sus lectores que realmente nos dan crédito por tales hazañas de riesgo, como hacer circular trenes en curvas esféricas. Las curvas horizontales en los niveles son lo suficientemente peligrosas, las curvas verticales serían mil veces peores, y con nuestro material rodante construido como actualmente físicamente imposible ".
11) Un topógrafo e ingeniero de treinta años publicado en el Birmingham Weekly Mercury declaró: “Estoy completamente familiarizado con la teoría y la práctica de la ingeniería civil. Por muy intolerante que algunos de nuestros profesores puedan estar en la teoría de la encuesta de acuerdo con las reglas prescritas, sin embargo, es bien sabido entre nosotros que tales mediciones teóricas son INCAPIBLES DE CUALQUIER ILUSTRACIÓN PRÁCTICA. Todas nuestras locomotoras están diseñadas para funcionar en lo que puede considerarse como NIVELES VERDADEROS o PISOS. Por supuesto, hay inclinaciones o pendientes parciales aquí y allá, pero siempre se definen con precisión y deben atravesarse con cuidado. Pero cualquier cosa que se acerque a ocho pulgadas en la milla, aumentando a medida que el cuadrado de la distancia, NO PODRÍA SER TRABAJADO POR NINGÚN MOTOR QUE SE HAYA FABRICADO. Tomando una estación con otra en toda Inglaterra y Escocia, se puede afirmar que todas las plataformas están EN EL MISMO NIVEL RELATIVO. La distancia entre las costas este y oeste de Inglaterra puede establecerse en 300 millas. Si la curvatura prescrita era realmente la representada, las estaciones centrales en Rugby o Warwick deberían estar cerca de tres millas más arriba que un acorde extraído de las dos extremidades. Si tal fuera el caso, no hay un conductor o fogonero dentro del Reino que se haga cargo del tren. Solo podemos reírnos de aquellos de sus lectores que realmente nos dan crédito por tales hazañas de riesgo, como hacer circular trenes en curvas esféricas. Las curvas horizontales en los niveles son lo suficientemente peligrosas, las curvas verticales serían mil veces peores, y con nuestro material rodante construido como actualmente físicamente imposible ".
12) La compañía Manchester Ship Canal Company publicada en Earth Review declaró: “Es habitual en las construcciones de ferrocarriles y canales que todos los niveles se remitan a un dato que sea nominalmente horizontal y así se muestra en todas las secciones. No es una práctica en el diseño de Obras Públicas hacer concesiones para la curvatura de la tierra.
13) En un experimento francés del siglo XIX realizado por MM Biot y Arago, se colocó una poderosa lámpara con buenos reflectores en la cumbre del Desierto las Palmas en España y se puede ver desde Camprey en la isla de Iviza. Dado que la elevación de los dos puntos era idéntica y la distancia entre ellos cubría casi 100 millas, si la Tierra fuera una bola de 25,000 millas de circunferencia, ¡la luz debería haber estado a más de 6600 pies, una milla y un cuarto, debajo de la línea de visión!
14) El experimento del Teniente Coronel Portlock usó luces y heliostatos de oxihidrógeno Drummond para reflejar los rayos del sol a través de estaciones instaladas a través de 108 millas del Canal de San Jorge. Si la Tierra fuera en realidad una bola de 25,000 millas de circunferencia, la luz de Portlock debería haber permanecido oculta bajo una milla y media de curvatura.
15) Si la Tierra fuera realmente una esfera de 25,000 millas de circunferencia, los pilotos de aviones tendrían que corregir constantemente sus altitudes hacia abajo para no volar directamente hacia el "espacio exterior"; un piloto que desea simplemente mantener su altitud a una velocidad de crucero típica de 500 mph, ¡tendría que bajar constantemente la nariz hacia abajo y descender 2,777 pies (más de media milla) cada minuto! De lo contrario, sin compensación, en una hora el piloto se encontraría 31.5 millas más alto de lo esperado.
16) El experimento conocido como "Falla de Airy" demostró que las estrellas se mueven en relación con una Tierra estacionaria y no al revés. Al llenar primero un telescopio con agua para reducir la velocidad de la luz en el interior, luego calcular la inclinación necesaria para que la luz de las estrellas baje directamente por el tubo, Airy no pudo probar la teoría heliocéntrica ya que la luz de las estrellas ya estaba en el ángulo correcto sin cambios necesario, y en su lugar demostró que el modelo geocéntrico era correcto.
17) "La paradoja de Olber" afirma que si hubiera miles de millones de estrellas que son soles, el cielo nocturno se llenaría completamente de luz. Como dijo Edgar Allen Poe: "Si la sucesión de estrellas fuera infinita, el fondo del cielo nos presentaría una luminosidad uniforme, ya que no podría existir absolutamente ningún punto, en todo ese fondo, en el que no existiría una estrella". De hecho, la "Paradoja" de Olber no es más una paradoja que el experimento de George Airy fue un "fracaso". Ambas son en realidad excelentes refutaciones del modelo de bola giratoria heliocéntrica.
18) Los experimentos de Michelson-Morley y Sagnac intentaron medir el cambio en la velocidad de la luz debido al supuesto movimiento de la Tierra a través del espacio. Después de medir en todas las direcciones diferentes posibles en varios lugares, no pudieron detectar ningún cambio significativo, demostrando nuevamente el modelo geocéntrico estacionario.
19) Tycho Brahe argumentó en contra de la teoría heliocéntrica en su tiempo, postulando que si la Tierra giraba alrededor del Sol, el cambio en la posición relativa de las estrellas después de 6 meses de movimiento orbital no podía dejar de verse. Argumentó que las estrellas deberían parecer separarse a medida que nos acercamos y unirse cuando retrocedemos. De hecho, sin embargo, después de 190,000,000 millas de supuesta órbita alrededor del Sol, no se puede detectar ni una pulgada de paralaje en las estrellas, lo que demuestra que no nos hemos movido en absoluto.
20) Si la Tierra realmente girara constantemente hacia el este a más de 1000 mph, las balas de cañón y otros proyectiles disparados verticalmente deberían caer significativamente hacia el oeste. De hecho, sin embargo, cada vez que se ha probado esto, las balas de cañón disparadas verticalmente disparan hacia arriba un promedio de 14 segundos ascendentes, 14 segundos descendentes y caen al suelo a no más de 2 pies de distancia del cañón, a menudo directamente de regreso al cañón. bozal.
21) Si la Tierra girara constantemente hacia el Este a más de 1000 mph, ¡los helicópteros y globos aerostáticos deberían poder simplemente volar sobre la superficie de la Tierra y esperar a que sus destinos lleguen a ellos!
22) Si la Tierra realmente girara constantemente hacia el este a más de 1000 mph, durante la inmersión en la estratosfera de Red Bull, Felix Baumgartner, que pasó 3 horas ascendiendo sobre Nuevo México, debería haber aterrizado 2500 millas al oeste en el Océano Pacífico, pero en su lugar aterrizó a unas docenas de millas al este de El punto de despegue.
23) Los creyentes de la bola a menudo afirman que la "gravedad" arrastra mágica e inexplicablemente toda la atmósfera inferior de la Tierra en perfecta sincronización hasta una altura indeterminada donde esta atmósfera de rotación progresivamente más rápida da paso a la no rotación, no gravitación, no Atmósfera de espacio de vacío infinito. Sin embargo, tales teorías no sensoriales son desacreditadas por la lluvia, los fuegos artificiales, las aves, los insectos, las nubes, el humo, los aviones y los proyectiles, todo lo cual se comportaría de manera muy diferente si tanto la bola-Tierra como su atmósfera giraran constantemente hacia el este a 1000 mph.
24) Si la Tierra y su atmósfera giraran constantemente hacia el este a más de 1000 mph, los cañones orientados hacia el norte / sur deberían establecer un control, mientras que las balas de cañón que disparan hacia el este deberían caer significativamente más lejos que todas las demás, mientras que las balas de cañón que disparan hacia el oeste deberían caer significativamente más cerca. Sin embargo, en realidad, independientemente de en qué dirección se disparen los cañones, la distancia recorrida es siempre la misma.
25) Si la Tierra y su atmósfera giraran constantemente hacia el este a más de 1000 mph, ¡el avión comercial promedio que viaja a 500 mph nunca debería poder llegar a sus destinos hacia el Este antes de que vengan acelerando por detrás! Del mismo modo, los destinos hacia el oeste deben llegar a tres veces la velocidad, pero este no es el caso.
26) Citando "Heaven and Earth" de Gabrielle Henriet, "Si el vuelo hubiera sido inventado en la época de Copérnico, no hay duda de que pronto se habría dado cuenta de que su afirmación sobre la rotación de la tierra era incorrecta, debido a la relación existente entre la velocidad de un avión y la de la rotación de la tierra. Si la tierra gira, como se dice, a 1,000 millas por hora, y un avión vuela en la misma dirección a solo 500 millas, es obvio que su lugar de destino se eliminará cada minuto. Por otro lado, si el vuelo se llevara a cabo en la dirección opuesta a la de la rotación, se cubriría una distancia de 1,500 millas en una hora, en lugar de 500, ya que la velocidad de la rotación se debe agregar a la del avión . También podría señalarse que recientemente se ha logrado una velocidad de vuelo de 1,000 millas por hora, que se supone que es la rotación de la Tierra, de modo que un avión que vuela a esta velocidad en la misma dirección que la rotación no pudo cubrir ningún terreno en absoluto. Permanecería suspendido en el aire sobre el lugar desde donde despegó, ya que ambas velocidades son iguales ".
27) Si la Tierra y su atmósfera giraran constantemente hacia el Este a más de 1000 mph, aterrizar aviones en pistas de este tipo que se mueven rápidamente y que enfrentan todo tipo de direcciones Norte, Sur, Este, Oeste y de lo contrario sería prácticamente imposible, pero en realidad tales preocupaciones ficticias son completamente despreciable.
28) Si la Tierra y su atmósfera giraran constantemente hacia el Este a más de 1000 mph, entonces las nubes, el viento y los patrones climáticos no podrían ir de manera casual e impredecible en todas direcciones, con nubes que a menudo viajan en direcciones opuestas a diferentes altitudes simultáneamente.
29) Si la Tierra y su atmósfera giraran constantemente hacia el Este a más de 1000 mph, esto debería ser visto, escuchado, sentido o medido de alguna manera por alguien, sin embargo, nadie en la historia ha experimentado este supuesto movimiento hacia el Este; Mientras tanto, sin embargo, podemos escuchar, sentir y medir experimentalmente incluso la más leve brisa hacia el oeste.
30) En su libro "South Sea Voyages", el explorador ártico y antártico Sir James Clarke Ross, describió su experiencia en la noche del 27 de noviembre de 1839 y su conclusión de que la Tierra debe estar inmóvil: "El cielo está muy despejado ... permitió que observemos que el estrato más alto de nubes se mueve en una dirección exactamente opuesta a la del viento, una circunstancia que se registra con frecuencia en nuestro diario meteorológico tanto en el comercio del noreste como en el sureste, y también a menudo observado por antiguos viajeros. El Capitán Basil Hall lo presenció desde la cima del Pico de Teneriffe; y el Conde Strzelechi, al ascender la montaña volcánica de Kiranea, en Owhyhee, alcanzó a 4000 pies una elevación por encima de la del viento comercial, y experimentó la influencia de una corriente de aire opuesta de una condición higrométrica y termométrica diferente ... El Conde Strzelechi informó además Me parece de la siguiente circunstancia aparentemente anómala: que a la altura de 6000 pies encontró la corriente de aire que sopla en ángulo recto con los estratos inferiores, también con una condición higrométrica y termométrica diferente, pero más cálida que el entre estratos. Tal estado de la atmósfera es compatible solo con el hecho que otra evidencia ha demostrado, que la tierra está en reposo ".
31) Citando “Cosmogenia Zetetic”, Thomas Winships dice: “Deje que la 'imaginación' imagine a la mente qué fuerza tendría el aire que fue puesto en movimiento por un cuerpo esférico de 8,000 millas de diámetro, que en una hora estaba girando alrededor de 1,000 mph, corriendo por el espacio a 65,000 mph y girando por los cielos?Entonces, ¿dejemos que la 'conjetura' se esfuerce por descubrir si los habitantes de un globo así podrían mantenerse en pie? Si el globo terráqueo gira sobre su eje a una velocidad fabulosa de 1,000 millas por hora, una masa tan inmensa necesariamente causaría una tremenda ráfaga de viento en el espacio que ocupaba. El viento iría en una dirección, y cualquier cosa como las nubes que se pusieron 'dentro de la esfera de influencia' de la esfera giratoria, tendría que ir en la misma dirección. El hecho de que la tierra está en reposo se demuestra al volar cometas.
32) Si a la "gravedad" se le atribuye ser una fuerza lo suficientemente fuerte como para mantener los océanos, edificios, personas y atmósfera del mundo pegados a la superficie de una bola que gira rápidamente, entonces es imposible que la "gravedad" también sea lo suficientemente débil como para permita que pájaros pequeños, insectos y aviones despeguen y viajen libremente sin cesar en cualquier dirección.
33) Si se acredita a la "gravedad" como una fuerza lo suficientemente fuerte como para curvar la extensión masiva de los océanos alrededor de una Tierra globular, sería imposible para los peces y otras criaturas nadar a través de un agua tan poderosa.
34) Los capitanes de barco al navegar grandes distancias en el mar nunca necesitan tener en cuenta la supuesta curvatura de la Tierra en sus cálculos. Tanto Plane Sailing como Great Circle Sailing, los métodos de navegación más populares, utilizan trigonometría plana, no esférica, haciendo todos los cálculos matemáticos suponiendo que la Tierra es perfectamente plana. Si la Tierra fuera de hecho una esfera, una suposición tan errónea conduciría a constantes inexactitudes deslumbrantes. Plane Sailing ha funcionado perfectamente bien tanto en teoría como en práctica durante miles de años, sin embargo, y la trigonometría plana ha demostrado una y otra vez más precisa que la trigonometría esférica para determinar distancias a través de los océanos.
35) Si la Tierra fuera realmente un globo, entonces cada línea de latitud al sur del ecuador tendría que medir una circunferencia cada vez más pequeña a medida que avanzara el sur. Sin embargo, si la Tierra es un plano extendido, cada línea de latitud al sur del ecuador debería medir una circunferencia cada vez más grande a medida que avanza el Sur. El hecho de que muchos capitanes que navegan al sur del ecuador asumiendo la teoría globular se han encontrado drásticamente fuera de juicio, más aún, cuanto más lejos viajaba el Sur, testifica el hecho de que la Tierra no es una bola.
36) Durante los viajes del Capitán James Clark Ross alrededor de la circunferencia antártica, a menudo escribió en su diario perplejo sobre cómo se encontraban rutinariamente fuera de conformidad con sus cartas, afirmando que se encontraban a un promedio de 12-16 millas fuera de su cálculo todos los días. , luego más al sur hasta 29 millas.
37) El teniente Charles Wilkes dirigió una expedición de exploración de la Marina de los Estados Unidos a la Antártida desde 1838 hasta 1842, y en sus diarios también mencionó estar constantemente al este de su cálculo, a veces más de 20 millas en menos de 18 horas.
38) Para citar al reverendo Thomas Milner, “en el hemisferio sur, los navegantes a la India a menudo se han imaginado al este del Cabo cuando aún están al oeste, y han sido conducidos a tierra en la costa africana, que, según sus cálculos, se encuentran detrás de ellos. Esta desgracia le sucedió a una hermosa fragata, la Challenger, en 1845. ¿Cómo se perdió el barco 'Conquistador' de Su Majestad? ¿Cómo tantos otros buques nobles, perfectamente sanos, perfectamente tripulados, perfectamente navegados, han naufragado en un clima tranquilo, no solo en la noche oscura o en la niebla, sino a plena luz del día y sol, en el primer caso en las costas, en el último, sobre rocas hundidas, ¿por estar 'fuera de juicio'? ”La respuesta simple es que la Tierra no es una bola.
39) Las medidas de distancia prácticas tomadas del "Manual de Australia, Almanack, Directorio de embarcadores e importadores" indican que la distancia en línea recta entre Sydney y Nelson es de 1550 millas terrestres. Su diferencia de longitud dada es de 22 grados 2'14 ".Por lo tanto, si 22 grados 2'14 "de 360 son 1550 millas, la totalidad mediría 25,182 millas. Esto no solo es más grande que la bola que se dice que la Tierra está en el ecuador, sino que es 4262 millas más grande de lo que sería en la latitud sur de Sydney en un globo de dichas proporciones.
40) Desde cerca del Cabo de Hornos, Chile, hasta Port Philip en Melbourne, Australia, la distancia es de 10,500 millas, o 143 grados de longitud. El factorizar los grados restantes a 360 hace una distancia total de 26,430 millas alrededor de esta latitud particular, que es más de 1500 millas más ancha de lo que se supone que la Tierra está en el ecuador, y muchos más miles de millas más de lo que se supone que debería estar. tales latitudes del sur.
41) Cálculos similares realizados desde el Cabo de Buena Esperanza, Sudáfrica hasta Melbourne, Australia a una latitud promedio de 35.5 grados sur, han dado una cifra aproximada de más de 25,000 millas, que nuevamente es igual o mayor que la supuesta circunferencia más grande de la Tierra. en el ecuador Los cálculos de Sydney, Australia a Wellington, Nueva Zelanda a un promedio de 37.5 grados sur han dado una circunferencia aproximada de 25,500 millas, ¡aún mayor! De acuerdo con la teoría de la bola-Tierra, la circunferencia de la Tierra a 37.5 grados de latitud sur debería ser de solo 19,757 millas terrestres, casi seis mil millas menos que tales medidas prácticas.
42) En el modelo bola-Tierra, la Antártida es un continente de hielo que cubre la parte inferior de la bola desde 78 grados de latitud sur hasta 90 y, por lo tanto, no tiene más de 12,000 millas de circunferencia. Sin embargo, muchos de los primeros exploradores, incluidos Captian Cook y James Clark Ross, en su intento de circunnavegación antártica tomaron de 3 a 4 años y registraron 50-60,000 millas alrededor. El buque británico Challenger también realizó una circunnavegación indirecta pero completa de la Antártida que atraviesa 69,000 millas.Esto es completamente inconsistente con el modelo de pelota.
43) Si la Tierra fuera una bola, hay varios vuelos en el hemisferio sur que tendrían su camino más rápido y recto sobre el continente antártico como Santiago, Chile a Sydney, Australia. En lugar de tomar la ruta más corta y rápida en línea recta sobre la Antártida, todos esos vuelos desvían todo tipo de direcciones lejos de la Antártida, en lugar de reclamar que las temperaturas son demasiado frías para viajar en avión. Teniendo en cuenta el hecho de que hay muchos vuelos hacia / desde / sobre la Antártida, y la NASA afirma tener tecnología que los mantiene en condiciones mucho más frías (y mucho más calientes) que cualquier otro experimentado en la Tierra, tal excusa es claramente solo una excusa, y estas los vuelos no se hacen porque son imposibles.
44) Si la Tierra fuera una pelota, y la Antártida estuviera demasiado fría para volar, la única forma lógica de volar de Sydney a Santiago sería un tiro directo sobre el Pacífico que permanezca en el hemisferio sur todo el camino. El reabastecimiento de combustible podría realizarse en Nueva Zelanda u otros destinos del hemisferio sur en el camino si fuera absolutamente necesario. De hecho, sin embargo, los vuelos de Santiago a Sydney van al hemisferio norte haciendo escalas en LAX y otros aeropuertos de América del Norte antes de continuar de regreso al hemisferio sur. Tales desvíos ridículamente descarriados no tienen sentido en el mundo, pero tienen sentido perfecto y forman líneas casi rectas cuando se muestran en un mapa plano de la Tierra.
45) En una bola-Tierra, desde Johannesburgo, Sudáfrica hasta Perth, Australia debería ser un tiro directo sobre el Océano Índico con posibilidades convenientes de reabastecimiento de combustible en Mauritus o Madagascar. Sin embargo, en la práctica, la mayoría de los vuelos de Johannesburgo a Perth curiosamente se detienen en Dubai, Hong Kong o Malasia, todos los cuales no tienen sentido en la pelota, pero son completamente comprensibles cuando se mapean en una Tierra plana.
46) En una ciudad de Ciudad del Cabo, Sudáfrica, con destino a Buenos Aries, Argentina debería ser un tiro recto sobre el Atlántico siguiendo la misma línea de latitud, pero en su lugar, cada vuelo va primero a lugares de conexión en el hemisferio norte, deteniéndose en cualquier lugar de Londres a Turquía a Dubai. Una vez más, estos no tienen absolutamente ningún sentido en el mundo, pero son opciones completamente comprensibles cuando se mapean en una Tierra plana.
47) En una bola-Tierra de Johannesburgo, Sudáfrica a Sao Paolo, Brasil debería ser un tiro rápido y recto a lo largo de la 25 ° latitud sur, ¡pero en cambio casi todos los vuelos hacen una parada de reabastecimiento de combustible en la latitud norte de 50 ° grado en Londres primero! La única razón por la que una parada tan ridícula funciona en realidad es porque la Tierra es plana.
48) En una bola-Tierra, Santiago, Chile a Johannesburgo, Sudáfrica, debería ser un vuelo fácil, todo bajo el Trópico de Capricornio en el hemisferio sur, sin embargo, cada vuelo enumerado hace una curiosa parada de reabastecimiento de combustible en Senegal, cerca del Trópico de ¡Cáncer en el hemisferio norte primero! Sin embargo, cuando se mapea en una Tierra plana, la razón por la que se ve claramente, Senegal se encuentra directamente en un camino en línea recta a medio camino entre los dos.
49) Si la Tierra fuera una bola giratoria calentada por un Sol a 93 millones de millas de distancia, sería imposible tener veranos sofocantes simultáneamente en África, mientras que a unos pocos miles de millas de distancia los inviernos congelados del Ártico / Antártico congelan los huesos y experimentan poco o ningún calor del Sol en absoluto. Si el calor del Sol viajó 93,000,000 millas al desierto del Sahara, es absurdo afirmar que otras 4,000 millas (0.00004%) más lejos a la Antártida negarían por completo ese calor sofocante que resultaría en diferencias tan drásticas.
50) Si la Tierra fuera realmente un globo terráqueo, las regiones polares árticas y antárticas y las áreas de latitud comparable Norte y Sur del ecuador deberían compartir condiciones y características similares, como temperaturas comparables, cambios estacionales, duración de la luz del día, vida vegetal y animal. Sin embargo, en realidad, las regiones árticas / antárticas y las áreas de latitud comparable Norte / Sur del ecuador difieren enormemente en muchos aspectos, completamente inconsistentes con el modelo de pelota y completamente consistentes con el modelo plano.
51) La Antártida es, con mucho, el lugar más frío de la Tierra, con una temperatura media anual de aproximadamente -57 grados Fahrenheit, ¡y un mínimo histórico de -135.8! Sin embargo, la temperatura media anual en el Polo Norte es de 4 grados comparativamente cálidos. A lo largo del año, las temperaturas en la Antártida varían menos de la mitad en latitudes árticas comparables. La región del Ártico Norte disfruta de veranos moderadamente cálidos e inviernos manejables, mientras que la región Antártica del Sur nunca se calienta lo suficiente como para derretir la nieve y el hielo perpetuos. En una bola oscilante, tambaleante, la Tierra girando uniformemente alrededor del Sol, las temperaturas y estaciones árticas y antárticas no deberían variar tanto.
52) Islandia a 65 grados de latitud norte es el hogar de 870 especies de plantas nativas y abundante vida animal variada. Compare esto con la Isla de Georgia a solo 54 grados de latitud sur, donde solo hay 18 especies de plantas nativas y la vida animal es casi inexistente. ¡La misma latitud que Canadá o Inglaterra en el norte, donde abundan los densos bosques de varios árboles altos, el infame Capitán Cook escribió sobre Georgia que no pudo encontrar un solo arbusto lo suficientemente grande como para hacer un palillo de dientes! Cook escribió: “No se veía ningún árbol. Las tierras que se encuentran al sur están condenadas por naturaleza a la gélida perpetua, para nunca sentir el calor de los rayos del sol; cuyo aspecto horrible y salvaje no tengo palabras para describir. Incluso la vida marina es escasa en ciertas extensiones de gran extensión, y rara vez se observa a las aves marinas volando sobre esos desechos solitarios. Los contrastes entre los límites de la vida orgánica en las zonas árticas y antárticas son muy notables y significativos ".
53) En lugares de latitud norte y sur comparables, el Sol se comporta de manera muy diferente a como lo haría en una Tierra que gira, pero precisamente como debería hacerlo en una Tierra plana. Por ejemplo, los días de verano más largos al norte del ecuador son mucho más largos que los del sur del ecuador, y los días de invierno más cortos al norte del ecuador son mucho más cortos que el sur más corto del ecuador.Esto es inexplicable en una Tierra que gira de manera uniforme y oscilante, pero se ajusta exactamente en el modelo plano con el Sol viajando en círculos sobre y alrededor de la Tierra de Trópico a Trópico.
54) En lugares de latitud norte y sur comparables, el amanecer y el anochecer suceden de manera muy diferente a lo que sucedería en una bola giratoria, pero precisamente como deberían en una Tierra plana.En el norte, el amanecer y el anochecer llegan lentamente y duran mucho más que en el sur, donde van y vienen muy rápido. Ciertos lugares en el crepúsculo norte pueden durar más de una hora, mientras que en latitudes meridionales comparables en unos pocos minutos la luz solar desaparece por completo. Esto es inexplicable en una Tierra que gira uniformemente y se tambalea, pero es exactamente lo que se espera en una Tierra plana con el Sol viajando círculos más rápidos y anchos sobre el Sur y círculos más lentos y estrechos sobre el Norte.
55) Si el Sol gira sobre y alrededor de la Tierra cada 24 horas, viajando constantemente de Trópico a Trópico cada 6 meses, se deduce que la región central del norte recibiría anualmente mucho más calor y luz solar que la región circunferencial del sur. Dado que el Sol debe barrer sobre la región Sur más grande en las mismas 24 horas, debe pasar sobre la región Norte más pequeña, su paso también debe ser proporcionalmente más rápido. Esto explica perfectamente las diferencias en las temperaturas del Ártico / Antártico, las estaciones, la duración de la luz del día, la vida vegetal y animal; esta es la razón por la que el amanecer y el crepúsculo antártico de la mañana son muy abruptos en comparación con el norte; ¡y esto explica por qué muchas noches árticas de pleno verano el Sol no se pone en absoluto!
56) El "Sol de medianoche" es un fenómeno ártico que ocurre anualmente durante el solsticio de verano, donde durante varios días seguidos, un observador significativamente lo suficientemente al norte puede ver al Sol viajando en círculos sobre la cabeza, subiendo y bajando en el cielo durante todo el día, pero nunca ¡totalmente configurado para más de 72 horas! Si la Tierra fuera en realidad un globo giratorio que gira alrededor del Sol, el único lugar donde se podría observar un fenómeno como el Sol de Medianoche sería en los polos. Cualquier otro punto de vista desde 89 grados de latitud hacia abajo nunca podría, independientemente de cualquier inclinación o inclinación, ver el Sol durante 24 horas seguidas. Para ver el Sol durante toda una revolución en un globo giratorio en un punto distinto de los polos, ¡deberías estar mirando kilómetros y kilómetros de tierra y mar durante parte de la revolución!
57) El establecimiento afirma que el IS Midnight Sun tiene experiencia en la Antártida, pero convenientemente no tienen videos sin cortes que muestren esto, ni permiten que exploradores independientes viajen a la Antártida durante el solsticio de invierno para verificar o refutar estas afirmaciones. Por el contrario, hay docenas de videos sin cortar disponibles públicamente que muestran el Arctic Midnight Sun y se ha verificado sin lugar a dudas.
58) La Real Sociedad Geográfica Belga en su "Expedición Antártica Belga", registró que durante la parte más severa del invierno antártico, a partir de 71 grados de latitud sur, el sol se pone el 17 de mayo y no se vuelve a ver por encima del horizonte hasta julio 21st! Esto está completamente en desacuerdo con la teoría de la Tierra-bola, pero se explica fácilmente por el modelo de la Tierra plana. El Sol de Medianoche se ve desde grandes altitudes en las latitudes extremas del norte durante el verano ártico porque el Sol, en su ciclo más interno, está dando vueltas lo suficientemente apretadas alrededor del centro polar como para permanecer visible sobre el horizonte para alguien en un punto tan ventajoso. Del mismo modo, en latitudes meridionales extremas durante el verano ártico, el Sol desaparece por completo de la vista durante más de 2 meses porque allí, en el Trópico Norte, en el arco más interno de su viaje en bumerang, el Sol rodea el centro del Norte con demasiada fuerza para ser visto. de la circunferencia sur.
59) Citando a Gabrielle Henriet, “La teoría de la rotación de la tierra puede descartarse definitivamente de una vez por todas como impracticable señalando la siguiente inadvertencia. Se dice que la rotación dura veinticuatro horas y que su velocidad es uniforme, en cuyo caso, necesariamente, los días y las noches deben tener una duración idéntica de doce horas cada uno durante todo el año. El sol debería salir invariablemente por la mañana y ponerse por la tarde a las mismas horas, con el resultado de que sería el equinoccio todos los días del 1 de enero al 31 de diciembre. Uno debería detenerse y reflexionar sobre esto antes de decir que la Tierra tiene un movimiento de rotación. ¿Cómo explica el sistema de gravitación las variaciones estacionales en la duración de los días y las noches si la tierra gira a una velocidad uniforme en veinticuatro horas?
60) Cualquiera puede probar el horizonte marino perfectamente recto y toda la Tierra perfectamente plana usando nada más que un nivel, trípodes y una tabla de madera. A cualquier altitud sobre el nivel del mar, simplemente fije un tablero nivelado de 6 a 12 pies de largo, liso, sobre los trípodes y observe el horizonte desde el nivel de los ojos detrás de él. El horizonte distante siempre se alineará perfectamente paralelo con el borde superior del tablero. Además, si te mueves en un semicírculo de un extremo al otro del tablero mientras observas el horizonte sobre el borde superior, podrás trazar un claro y plano 10-20 millas dependiendo de tu altitud. Esto sería imposible si la Tierra fuera un globo de 25,000 millas de circunferencia; el horizonte se alinearía sobre el centro del tablero pero luego, gradualmente, disminuiría notablemente hacia las extremidades. Solo diez millas a cada lado necesitarían una curvatura fácilmente visible de 66.6 pies desde cada extremo hacia el centro.
61) Si la Tierra fuera en realidad una gran bola de 25,000 millas de circunferencia, el horizonte estaría notablemente curvado incluso al nivel del mar, y todo lo que se encuentre o se acerque al horizonte parecería inclinarse ligeramente hacia atrás desde su perspectiva. Los edificios distantes a lo largo del horizonte se verían como torres inclinadas de Piza que se alejan del observador. Un globo de aire caliente despegaba y luego se alejaba constantemente de ti, en una bola de la Tierra, lentamente y constantemente parecería inclinarse hacia atrás más y más a medida que se alejaba volando, el fondo de la canasta aparecía gradualmente a la vista como la parte superior del El globo desaparece de la vista. En realidad, sin embargo, los edificios, globos, árboles, personas, cualquier cosa y todo en ángulos rectos con respecto al suelo / horizonte permanece así, independientemente de la distancia o la altura del observador.
62) Los experimentos de Samuel Rowbotham en Old Bedford Level demostraron de manera concluyente que el agua del canal era completamente plana en un tramo de 6 millas. Primero se paró en el canal con su telescopio sostenido a 8 pulgadas sobre la superficie del agua, luego su amigo en un bote con una bandera de 5 pies de altura navegó a 6 millas de distancia. Si la Tierra fuera una bola de 25,000 millas de circunferencia, el tramo de 6 millas de agua debería haber comprendido un arco de exactamente 6 pies de altura en el medio, por lo que todo el bote y la bandera deberían haber desaparecido finalmente, cuando de hecho todo el bote y la bandera permanecieron visibles en la misma altura para todo el viaje.
63) En un segundo experimento, el Dr. Rowbotham colocó banderas de 5 pies de altura a lo largo de la costa, una en cada marcador de milla.Luego, usando su telescopio montado a 5 pies justo detrás de la primera bandera, miró por encima de las 6 banderas que se alinearon en una línea perfectamente recta. Si la Tierra fuera una bola de 25,000 millas de circunferencia, las banderas deberían haberse hundido progresivamente después de la primera línea de visión establecida, la segunda habría descendido 8 pulgadas, 32 pulgadas por la tercera, 6 pies por la cuarta, 10 pies 8 pulgadas por el quinto, y 16 pies y 8 pulgadas para el sexto.
64) Citando “¡Tierra no es un globo!” De Samuel Rowbotham, “Se sabe que el horizonte en el mar, cualquiera que sea la distancia que pueda extenderse a la derecha e izquierda del observador en tierra, siempre aparece como una línea recta. El siguiente experimento ha sido probado en varias partes del país. En Brighton, en un terreno ascendente cerca de la pista de carreras, se fijaron dos postes en la tierra a seis yardas de distancia, y directamente frente al mar. Entre estos polos, una línea se estiraba estrechamente paralela al horizonte.Desde el centro de la línea, la vista abarcaba no menos de 20 millas a cada lado, haciendo una distancia de 40 millas. Se observó una embarcación navegando directamente hacia el oeste; La línea cortó el aparejo un poco por encima de los baluartes, lo que hizo durante varias horas o hasta que el barco había navegado toda la distancia de 40 millas. La nave que aparece a la vista desde el este tendría que ascender un avión inclinado durante 20 millas hasta llegar al centro del arco, de donde tendría que descender por la misma distancia. El cuadrado de 20 millas multiplicado por 8 pulgadas da 266 pies como la cantidad que la embarcación estaría debajo de la línea al principio y al final de las 40 millas ".
65) También citando al Dr. Rowbotham, “En la costa cerca de Waterloo, a unas pocas millas al norte de Liverpool, se fijó un buen telescopio, a una altura de 6 pies sobre el agua. Fue dirigido a un gran barco de vapor, justo saliendo del río Mersey, y navegando hacia Dublín. Poco a poco, la cabeza del mástil de la nave que retrocedía se acercó al horizonte, hasta que, al cabo de más de cuatro horas, desapareció. La velocidad normal de navegación de los barcos de vapor de Dublín era de ocho millas por hora; para que la embarcación estuviera, al menos, a treinta y dos millas de distancia cuando la cabeza del mástil llegara al horizonte. Los 6 pies de elevación del telescopio requerirían que se dedujeran tres millas por convexidad, lo que dejaría veintinueve millas, cuyo cuadrado, multiplicado por 8 pulgadas, da 560 pies; deduciendo 80 pies para la altura del mástil principal, y encontramos que, de acuerdo con la doctrina de la rotundidad, la cabeza del mástil del vaporizador externo debería haber estado 480 pies debajo del horizonte. Se han realizado muchos otros experimentos de este tipo en barcos de vapor, y siempre con resultados totalmente incompatibles con la teoría de que la Tierra es un globo ".
66) El Dr. Rowbotham realizó varios otros experimentos utilizando telescopios, niveles de burbuja, sextantes y "teodolitos", instrumentos especiales de precisión utilizados para medir ángulos en planos horizontales o verticales. Al colocarlos a la misma altura uno contra el otro sucesivamente, demostró una y otra vez que la Tierra era perfectamente plana durante millas sin una sola pulgada de curvatura.Sus hallazgos causaron un gran revuelo en la comunidad científica y gracias a 30 años de sus esfuerzos, la forma de la Tierra se convirtió en un tema candente de debate a principios del siglo XIX.
67) La distancia a través del Mar de Irlanda desde el puerto Douglas de la isla de Man hasta la cabeza de Great Orm's en el norte de Gales es de 60 millas. Si la Tierra fuera un globo, entonces la superficie del agua entre ellos formaría un arco de 60 millas, el centro se elevaría a 1944 pies más alto que las costas en cada extremo. Es bien conocido y fácilmente verificable, sin embargo, que en un día despejado, desde una modesta altitud de 100 pies, la Cabeza del Gran Orm es visible desde el puerto de Douglas. Esto sería completamente imposible en un globo de 25,000 millas. Suponiendo que la altitud de 100 pies hace que el horizonte aparezca aproximadamente a 13 millas de distancia, las 47 millas restantes significan que la costa de Gales aún debe caer a 1472 pies por debajo de la línea de visión.
68) El horizonte de Filadelfia es claramente visible desde Apple Pie Hill en New Jersey Pine Barrens a 40 millas de distancia. Si la Tierra fuera una bola de 25,000 millas de circunferencia, teniendo en cuenta la elevación de 205 pies de Apple Pie Hill, el horizonte de Filadelfia debería permanecer bien oculto más allá de 335 pies de curvatura.
69) El horizonte de la ciudad de Nueva York es claramente visible desde el Bear Mountain del Parque Estatal Harriman, a 60 millas de distancia.Si la Tierra fuera una bola de 25,000 millas de circunferencia, vista desde la cumbre de 1,283 pies de Bear Mountain, el teorema de Pitágoras que determina la distancia al horizonte es 1.23 veces la raíz cuadrada de la altura en pies, el horizonte de Nueva York debería ser invisible detrás de 170 pies de Tierra curva .
70) Desde Washington's Rock en Nueva Jersey, a solo 400 pies de altura, en un día despejado es posible ver los horizontes de Nueva York y Filadelfia en direcciones opuestas al mismo tiempo, ¡cubriendo una distancia total de 120 millas! Si la Tierra fuera una bola de 25,000 millas de circunferencia, ambos horizontes deberían estar escondidos detrás de más de 800 pies de la curvatura de la Tierra.
71) A menudo es posible ver el horizonte de Chicago desde el nivel del mar 60 millas de distancia a través del lago Michigan. En 2015 después de fotógrafo Joshua Nowicki fotografiado este fenómeno varios canales de noticias afirmaron rápidamente su imagen para ser un "espejismo superior", una anomalía atmosférica causada por inversión térmica. Mientras que éstos ciertamente ocurren, la línea del horizonte en cuestión se enfrenta a-boca arriba y claramente visto a diferencia de un espejismo ilusorio nebuloso, y tras un centro a la Tierra 25.000 millas de circunferencia debe ser 2,400 pies por debajo del horizonte.
72) 16 de octubre 1854 el periódico Times informó visita de la Reina de Gran Grimsby desde la grabación del casco fueron capaces de ver el 300 pies de altura torre de muelle de 70 millas de distancia. En una bola a la Tierra 25.000 millas de circunferencia, factoraje su elevación de 10 pies por encima del agua y la altura de 300 pies de la torre, a 70 millas de distancia de la torre muelle debería haber permanecido todo un 2,600 pies por debajo del horizonte.
73) En 1872 el capitán. Gibson y compañeros de tripulación, navegando el buque "Thomas Wood" de China a Londres, dijeron haber visto la totalidad de la isla de St. Helena en un día claro de 75 millas de distancia.Factoring en su apogeo durante la medición en una bola a la Tierra 25.000 millas de circunferencia, se encontró la isla debería haber sido 3.650 pies por debajo de su línea de visión.
74) A partir de Génova, Italia, a una altura de sólo 70 pies por encima del nivel del mar, la isla de Gorgona a menudo puede ser visto 81 millas de distancia. Si la Tierra fuera una pelota de 25.000 millas de circunferencia, Gorgona debe estar oculto más allá de 3332 pies de curvatura.
75) A partir de Génova, Italia, a una altura de sólo 70 pies por encima del nivel del mar, la isla de Córcega, a menudo puede ser visto 99 millas de distancia.Si la Tierra fuera una pelota de 25.000 millas de circunferencia, Córcega debería caer 5,245 pies, casi toda una milla por debajo del horizonte.
76) Desde Génova, Italia 70 pies sobre el nivel del mar, la isla de Capraia 102 millas de distancia a menudo pueden ser vistos también. Si la Tierra fuera una pelota de 25.000 millas de circunferencia, Capraia siempre debe permanecer oculto detrás de 5,605 pies, más de una milla de la supuesta curvatura.
77) También desde Génova, en los días claros brillantes, la isla de Elba se puede ver un increíble 125 millas de distancia!Si la Tierra fuera una pelota de 25.000 millas de circunferencia, Elba debe ser por siempre invisible detrás de 8,770 pies de curvatura.
78) A partir de Anchorage, Alaska, a una altura de 102 pies, en los días claros Monte Foraker se puede ver a simple vista 120 millas de distancia. Si la Tierra fuera una pelota de 25.000 millas de circunferencia, 17400 cumbre del Monte Foraker debe recostado aleja del observador cubierto por 7.719 pies de curvado de la Tierra. En realidad, sin embargo, toda la montaña puede ser fácilmente visto de pie directamente desde la base hasta la cumbre.
79) A partir de Anchorage, Alaska, a una altura de 102 pies, en los días claros Monte McKinley se puede ver a simple vista desde 130 millas de distancia. Si la Tierra fuera una pelota de 25.000 millas de circunferencia, cumbre de 20.320 pies del monte McKinley debe recostado aleja del observador y casi la mitad cubierto por 9.220 pies de curvado de la Tierra. En realidad, sin embargo, toda la montaña puede ser fácilmente visto de pie directamente desde la base hasta la cumbre.
80) In Chambers’ Journal, February 1895, a sailor near Mauritius in the Indian Ocean reported having seen a vessel which turned out to be an incredible 200 miles away! The incident caused much heated debate in nautical circles at the time, gaining further confirmation in Aden, Yemen where another witness reported seeing a missing Bombay steamer from 200 miles away. He correctly stated the precise appearance, location and direction of the steamer all later corroborated and confirmed correct by those onboard. Such sightings are absolutely inexplicable if the Earth were actually a ball 25,000 miles around, as ships 200 miles distant would have to fall approximately 5 miles below line of sight!
81) The distance from which various lighthouse lights around the world are visible at sea far exceeds what could be found on a ball-Earth 25,000 miles in circumference. For example, the Dunkerque Light in southern France at an altitude of 194 feet is visible from a boat (10 feet above sea-level) 28 miles away. Spherical trigonometry dictates that if the Earth was a globe with the given curvature of 8 inches per mile squared, this light should be hidden 190 feet below the horizon.
82) The Port Nicholson Light in New Zealand is 420 feet above sea-level and visible from 35 miles away where it should be 220 feet below the horizon.
83) The Egerö Light in Norway is 154 feet above high-water and visible from 28 statute miles where it should be 230 feet below the horizon.
84) The Light at Madras, on the Esplanade, is 132 feet high and visible from 28 miles away, where it should be 250 feet below the line of sight.
85) The Cordonan Light on the west coast of France is 207 feet high and visible from 31 miles away, where it should be 280 feet below the line of sight.
86) The light at Cape Bonavista, Newfoundland is 150 feet above sea-level and visible at 35 miles, where it should be 491 feet below the horizon.
87) The lighthouse steeple of St. Botolph’s Parish Church in Boston is 290 feet tall and visible from over 40 miles away, where it should be hidden a full 800 feet below the horizon!
88) The Isle of Wight lighthouse in England is 180 feet high and can be seen up to 42 miles away, a distance at which modern astronomers say the light should fall 996 feet below line of sight.
89) The Cape L’Agulhas lighthouse in South Africa is 33 feet high, 238 feet above sea level, and can be seen for over 50 miles. If the world were a globe, this light would fall 1,400 feet below an observer’s line of sight.
90) The Statue of Liberty in New York stands 326 feet above sea level and on a clear day can be seen as far as 60 miles away. If the Earth were a globe, that would put Lady Liberty at an impossible 2,074 feet below the horizon.
91) The lighthouse at Port Said, Egypt, at an elevation of only 60 feet has been seen an astonishing 58 miles away, where, according to modern astronomy it should be 2,182 feet below the line of sight!
92) The Notre Dame Antwerp spire stands 403 feet high from the foot of the tower with Strasburg measuring 468 feet above sea level. With the aid of a telescope, ships can be distinguished on the horizon and captains declare they can see the cathedral spire from an amazing 150 miles away. If the Earth were a globe, however, at that distance the spire should be an entire mile, 5,280 feet below the horizon!
177) In the documentary “A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon,” you can watch official leaked NASA footage showing Apollo 11 astronauts Buzz Aldrin, Neil Armstrong and Michael Collins, for almost an hour, using transparencies and camera-tricks to fake shots of a round Earth! They communicate over audio with control in Houston about how to accurately stage the shot, and someone keeps prompting them on how to effectively manipulate the camera to achieve the desired effect. First, they blacked out all the windows except for a downward facing circular one, which they aimed the camera towards from several feet away. This created the illusion of a ball-shaped Earth surrounded by the blackness of space, when in fact it was simply a round window in their dark cabin. Neil Armstrong claimed at this point to be 130,000 miles from Earth, half-way to the Moon, but when camera-tricks were finished the viewer could see for themselves the astro-nots were not more than a couple dozen miles above the Earth’s surface, likely flying in a high-altitude plane!
178) People claim Google Earth somehow proves the ball model without realizing that Google Earth is simply a composite program of images taken from high-altitude planes and street-level car-cameras superimposed onto a CGI model of a ball Earth. The same could be just as easily modeled onto a square Earth or any other shape and therefore cannot be used as proof of Earth’s rotundity.
179) If the Earth were constantly spinning Eastwards 1000mph then airplane flight durations going Eastwards vs. Westwards should be significantly different. If the average commercial airliner travels 500mph, it follows that Westbound equatorial flights should reach their destination at approximately thrice the speed as their Eastbound return flights. In reality, however, the differences in East/Westbound flight durations usually amount to a matter of minutes, and nothing near what would occur on a 1000mph spinning ball Earth.
180) The spinning ball model dictates that the Earth and atmosphere would be moving together at approximately 500mph at the mid-latitudes where an LA to NYC flight takes place. The average commercial airliner traveling 500mph takes 5.5 hours traveling East with the alleged rotation of the Earth, so the return flight West should take only 2.75 hours, but in fact we find the average NYC to LA flight takes 6 hours, a flight time totally inconsistent with the spinning ball model.
181) Flights Eastwards with the alleged spin of the ball-Earth from Tokyo to LA take an average of 10.5 hours, therefore the return flights Westwards against the alleged spin should take an average of 5.25 hours, but in actual fact take an average of 11.5 hours, another flight time totally inconsistent with the spinning ball model.
182) Flights Eastwards with the alleged spin of the ball-Earth from NY to London take an average of 7 hours, therefore the return flights Westwards against the alleged spin should take an average of 3.5 hours, but in actual fact take an average of 7.5 hours, a flight time totally inconsistent with the spinning ball model.
183) Flights Eastwards from Chicago to Boston with the alleged spin of the ball-Earth take an average of 2.25 hours, therefore the return flights Westwards against the alleged spin should take an average of just over an hour, but in actual fact take an average of 2.75 hours, once again, completely inconsistent with the spinning ball model.
184) Flights Eastwards from Paris to Rome with the alleged spin of the ball-Earth take an average of 2 hours, therefore the return flights Westwards against the alleged spin should take an average of 1 hour, but in actual fact have an average flight duration of 2 hours 10 minutes, a flight time totally inconsistent with the spinning ball model.
185) We are told that the Earth and atmosphere spin together at such a perfect uniform velocity that no one in history has ever seen, heard, felt or measured the supposed 1000mph movement. This is then often compared to traveling in a car at uniform velocity, where we only feel the movement during acceleration or deceleration. In reality, however, even with eyes closed, windows up, over smooth tar in a luxury car at a mere uniform 50mph, the movement absolutely can be felt! At 20 times this speed, Earth’s imaginary 1000mph spin would most certainly be noticeable, felt, seen and heard by all.
186) People sensitive to motion sickness feel distinct unease and physical discomfort from motion as slight as an elevator or a train ride. This means that the 1000mph alleged uniform spin of the Earth has no effect on such people, but add an extra 50mph uniform velocity of a car and their stomach starts turning knots. The idea that motion sickness is nowhere apparent in anyone at 1000mph, but suddenly comes about at 1050mph is ridiculous and proves the Earth is not in motion whatsoever.
187) The second law of thermodynamics, otherwise known as the law of entropy, along with the fundamental principles of friction/resistance determine the impossibility of Earth being a uniformly spinning ball. Over time, the spinning ball Earth would experience measurable amounts of drag constantly slowing the spin and lengthening the amount of hours per day. As not the slightest such change has ever been observed in all of recorded history it is absurd to assume the Earth has ever moved an inch.
188) Over the years NASA has twice changed their story regarding the shape of the Earth. At first they maintained Earth was a perfect sphere, which later changed to an “oblate spheroid” flattened at the poles, and then changed again to being “pear-shaped” as the Southern hemisphere allegedly bulges out as well. Unfortunately for NASA, however, none of their official pictures show an oblate spheroid or pear-shaped Earth! All their pictures, contrary to their words, show a spherical (and clearly CGI fake) Earth.
189) The Bible, Koran, Srimad Bhagavatam, and many other holy books describe and purport the existence of a geocentric, stationary flat Earth. For example, 1 Chronicles 16:30 and Psalm 96:10 both read, “He has fixed the earth firm, immovable.” And Psalm 93:1 says, “The world also is stablished, that it cannot be moved.” The Bible also repeatedly affirms that the Earth is “outstretched” as a plane, with the outstretched heavens everywhere above (not all around) giving a scriptural proof the Earth is not a spinning ball.
190) Cultures the world over throughout history have all described and purported the existence of a geocentric, stationary flat Earth. Egyptians, Indians, Mayans, Chinese, Native Americans and literally every ancient civilization on Earth had a geocentric flat-Earth cosmology. Before Pythagoras, the idea of a spinning ball-Earth was non-existent and even after Pythagoras it remained an obscure minority view until 2000 years later when Copernicus began reviving the heliocentric theory.
191) From Pythagoras to Copernicus, Galileo and Newton, to modern astronauts like Aldrin, Armstrong and Collins, to director of NASA and Grand Commander of the 33rd degree C. Fred Kleinknecht, the founding fathers of the spinning ball mythos have all been Freemasons! The fact that so many members of this, the largest and oldest secret society in existence have all been co-conspirators bringing about this literal “planetary revolution” is beyond the possibility of coincidence and provides proof of organized collusion in creating and maintaining this multi-generational deception.
192) Quoting “Terra Firma” by David Wardlaw Scott, “The system of the Universe, as taught by Modern Astronomers, being founded entirely on theory, for the truth of which they are unable to advance one single real proof, they have entrenched themselves in a conspiracy of silence, and decline to answer any objections which may be made to their hypotheses … Copernicus himself, who revived the theory of the heathen philosopher Pythagoras, and his great exponent Sir Isaac Newton, confessed that their system of a revolving Earth was only a possibility, and could not be proved by facts. It is only their followers who have decorated it with the name of an ‘exact science,’ yea, according to them, ‘the most exact of all the sciences.’ Yet one Astronomer Royal for England once said, speaking of the motion of the whole Solar system: ‘The matter is left in a most delightful state of uncertainty, and I shall be very glad if any one can help me out of it.’ What a very sad position for an ‘exact science’ to be in is this!”
193) No child or un-indoctrinated man in their right-mind would ever conclude or even conceive given to their own devices, based on their own personal observations, that the Earth was a spinning ball revolving around the Sun! Such imaginative theories nowhere present in anyone’s daily experience require and have required massive amounts of constant propaganda to uphold the illusion.
194) From David Wardlaw Scott, “I remember being taught when a boy, that the Earth was a great ball, revolving at a very rapid rate around the Sun, and, when I expressed to my teacher my fears that the waters of the oceans would tumble off, I was told that they were prevented from doing so by Newton’s great law of Gravitation, which kept everything in its proper place. I presume that my countenance must have shown some signs of incredulity, for my teacher immediately added - I can show you a direct proof of this; a man can whirl around his head a pail filled with water without its being spilt, and so, in like manner, can the oceans be carried round the Sun without losing a drop. As this illustration was evidently intended to settle the matter, I then said no more upon the subject. Had such been proposed to me afterwards as a man, I would have answered somewhat as follows - Sir, I beg to say that the illustration you have given of a man whirling a pail of water round his head, and the oceans revolving round the Sun, does not in any degree confirm your argument, because the water in the two cases is placed under entirely different circumstances, but, to be of any value, the conditions in each case must be the same, which here they are not. The pail is a hollow vessel which holds the water inside it, whereas, according to your teaching, the Earth is a ball, with a continuous curvature outside, which, in agreement with the laws of nature, could not retain any water.”
195) Astronomers say the magical magnetism of gravity is what keeps all the oceans of the world stuck to the ball-Earth. They claim that because the Earth is so massive, by virtue of this mass it creates a magic force able to hold people, oceans and atmosphere tightly clung to the underside of the spinning ball. Unfortunately, however, they cannot provide any practical example of this on a scale smaller than the planetary. A spinning wet tennis ball, for instance, has the exact opposite effect of the supposed ball-Earth! Any water poured over it simply falls off the sides, and giving it a spin results in water flying off 360 degrees like a dog shaking after a bath. Astronomers concede the wet tennis ball example displays the opposite effect of their supposed ball-Earth, but claim that at some unknown mass, the magic adhesive properties of gravity suddenly kick in allowing the spinning wet tennis ball-Earth to keep every drop of “gravitized” water stuck to the surface. When such an unproven theory goes against all experiments, experience and common sense, it is high time to drop the theory.
196) Quoting Marshall Hall, “In short, the sun, moon, and stars are actually doing precisely what everyone throughout all history has seen them do. We do not believe what our eyes tell us because we have been taught a counterfeit system which demands that we believe what has never been confirmed by observation or experiment. That counterfeit system demands that the Earth rotate on an 'axis' every 24 hours at a speed of over 1000 MPH at the equator. No one has ever, ever, ever seen or felt such movement (nor seen or felt the 67,000MPH speed of the Earth's alleged orbit around the sun or its 500,000 MPH alleged speed around a galaxy or its retreat from an alleged 'Big Bang' at over 670,000,000 MPH!). Remember, no experiment has ever shown the earth to be moving. Add to that the fact that the alleged rotational speed we've all been taught as scientific fact MUST decrease every inch or mile one goes north or south of the equator, and it becomes readily apparent that such things as accurate aerial bombing in WWII (down a chimney from 25,000 feet with a plane going any direction at high speed) would have been impossible if calculated on an earth moving below at several hundred MPH and changing constantly with the latitude."
197) Some people claim there is no motive for such a grand-scale deception and that flat or a ball makes no difference. By removing Earth from the motionless center of the Universe, these Masons have moved us physically and metaphysically from a place of supreme importance to one of complete nihilistic indifference. If the Earth is the center of the Universe, then the ideas of God, creation, and a purpose for human existence are resplendent. But if the Earth is just one of billions of planets revolving around billions of stars in billions of galaxies, then the ideas of God, creation, and a specific purpose for Earth and human existence become highly implausible. By surreptitiously indoctrinating us into their scientific materialist Sun-worship, not only do we lose faith in anything beyond the material, we gain absolute faith in materiality, superficiality, status, selfishness, hedonism and consumerism. If there is no God, and everyone is just an accident, then all that really matters is me, me, me. They have turned Madonna, the Mother of God, into a material girl living in a material world. Their rich, powerful corporations with slick Sun-cult logos sell us idols to worship, slowly taking over the world while we tacitly believe their “science,” vote for their politicians, buy their products, listen to their music, and watch their movies, sacrificing our souls at the altar of materialism. To quote Morris Kline, “The heliocentric theory, by putting the sun at the center of the universe ... made man appear to be just one of a possible host of wanderers drifting through a cold sky. It seemed less likely that he was born to live gloriously and to attain paradise upon his death. Less likely, too, was it that he was the object of God’s ministrations.”
198) Some say the idea of an inter-generational world-wide conspiracy to delude the masses sounds implausible or unrealistic, but these people need only familiarize themselves with the works and writings of Freemasons themselves, for example John Robison who exposed this in his 1798 book, “Proofs of a Conspiracy Against All the Religions and Governments of Europe Carried Out in the Secret Meetings of the Freemasons, Illuminati and Reading Societies.” Supreme Commander of the 33rd degree Albert Pike was quite forth-coming in several letters regarding the Masons ultimate goal of world domination, and in the Zionist “Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion” the exact plan by which this would be and has been carried out is completely disclosed.
199) From “Foundations of Many Generations” by E. Eschini, “The one thing the fable of the revolving Earth has done, it has shown the terrible power of a lie, a lie has the power to make a man a mental slave, so that he dares not back the evidence of his own senses. To deny the plain and obvious movement of the Sun he sees before him. When he feels himself standing on an Earth utterly devoid of motion, at the suggestion of someone else he is prepared to accept that he is spinning furiously round. When he sees a bird flying, and gaining over the ground, he is prepared to believe that the ground is really travelling a great number of times faster than the bird, finally, in order to uphold the imagination of a madman, he is prepared to accuse his Maker of forming him a sensiferous lie.”
200) And finally, from Dr. Rowbotham, “Thus we see that this Newtonian philosophy is devoid of consistency; its details are the result of an entire violation of the laws of legitimate reasoning, and all its premises are assumed. It is, in fact, nothing more than assumption upon assumption, and the conclusions derived therefrom are willfully considered as things proved, and to be employed as truths to substantiate the first and fundamental assumptions. Such a ‘juggle and jumble’ of fancies and falsehoods extended and intensified as in theoretical astronomy is calculated to make the unprejudiced inquirer revolt with horror from the terrible conjuration which has been practised upon him; to sternly resolve to resist its further progress; to endeavour to over-throw the entire edifice, and to bury in its ruins the false honours which have been associated with its fabricators, and which still attach to its devotees. For the learning, the patience, the perseverance and devotion for which they have ever been examples, honour and applause need not be withheld; but their false reasoning, the advantages they have taken of the general ignorance of mankind in respect to astronomical subjects, and the unfounded theories they have advanced and defended, cannot be otherwise than regretted, and ought to be by every possible means uprooted.”
93) The St. George’s Channel between Holyhead and Kingstown Harbor near Dublin is 60 miles across. When half-way across a ferry passenger will notice behind them the light on Holyhead pier as well as in front of them the Poolbeg light in Dublin Bay. The Holyhead Pier light is 44 feet high, while the Poolbeg lighthouse 68 feet, therefore a vessel in the middle of the channel, 30 miles from either side standing on a deck 24 feet above the water, can clearly see both lights. On a ball Earth 25,000 miles in circumference, however, both lights should be hidden well below both horizons by over 300 feet!
94) From the highland near Portsmouth Harbor in Hampshire, England looking across Spithead to the Isle of Wight, the entire base of the island, where water and land come together composes a perfectly straight line 22 statute miles long. According to the ball-Earth theory, the Isle of Wight should decline 80 feet from the center on each side to account for the necessary curvature. The cross-hairs of a good theodolite directed there, however, have repeatedly shown the land and water line to be perfectly level.
95) On a clear day from the highland near Douglas Harbor on the Isle of Man, the whole length of the coast of North Wales is often plainly visible to the naked eye. From the Point of Ayr at the mouth of the River Dee to Holyhead comprises a 50 mile stretch which has also been repeatedly found to be perfectly horizontal. If the Earth actually had curvature of 8 inches per mile squared, as NASA and modern astronomy claim, the 50 mile length of Welsh coast seen along the horizon in Liverpool Bay would have to decline from the center-point an easily detectable 416 feet on each side!
96) From “100 Proofs the Earth is Not a Globe” by William Carpenter, “If we take a journey down the Chesapeake Bay, by night, we shall see the ‘light’ exhibited at Sharpe's Island for an hour before the steamer gets to it. We may take up a position on the deck so that the rail of the vessel's side will be in a line with the ‘light’ and in the line of sight; and we shall find that in the whole journey the light won't vary in the slightest degree in its apparent elevation. But, say that a distance of thirteen miles has been traversed, the astronomers' theory of ‘curvature’ demands a difference (one way or the other!) in the apparent elevation of the light, of 112 feet 8 inches! Since, however, there is not a difference of 100 hair's breadths, we have a plain proof that the water of the Chesapeake Bay is not curved, which is a proof that the Earth is not a globe.”
97) NASA and modern astronomy say the Earth is a giant ball tilted back, wobbling and spinning 1,000 mph around its central axis, traveling 67,000 mph circles around the Sun, spiraling 500,000 mph around the Milky Way, while the entire galaxy rockets a ridiculous 670,000,000 mph through the Universe, with all of these motions originating from an alleged “Big Bang” cosmogenic explosion 14 billion years ago. That’s a grand total of 670,568,000 mph in several different directions we’re all supposedly speeding along at simultaneously, yet no one has ever seen, felt, heard, measured or proven a single one of these motions to exist whatsoever.
98) NASA and modern astronomy say Polaris, the North Pole star, is somewhere between 323-434 light years, or about 2 quadrillion miles, away from us! Firstly, note that is between 1,938,000,000,000,000 - 2,604,000,000,000,000 miles making a difference of 666,000,000,000,000 (over six hundred trillion) miles! If modern astronomy cannot even agree on the distance to stars within hundreds of trillions of miles, perhaps their “science” is flawed and their theory needs re-examining. However, even granting them their obscurely distant stars, it is impossible for heliocentrists to explain how Polaris manages to always remain perfectly aligned straight above the North Pole throughout Earth’s various alleged tilting, wobbling, rotating and revolving motions.
99) Viewed from a ball-Earth, Polaris, situated directly over the North Pole, should not be visible anywhere in the Southern hemisphere. For Polaris to be seen from the Southern hemisphere of a globular Earth, the observer would have to be somehow looking “through the globe,” and miles of land and sea would have to be transparent. Polaris can be seen, however, up to over 20 degrees South latitude.
100) If Earth were a ball, the Southern Cross and other Southern constellations would all be visible at the same time from every longitude on the same latitude as is the case in the North with Polaris and its surrounding constellations. Ursa Major/Minor and many others can be seen from every Northern meridian simultaneously whereas in the South, constellations like the Southern Cross cannot. This proves the Southern hemisphere is not “turned under” as in the ball-Earth model, but simply stretching further outwards away from the Northern center-point as in the flat Earth model.
101) Sigma Octantis is claimed to be a Southern central pole star similar to Polaris, around which the Southern hemisphere stars all rotate around the opposite direction. Unlike Polaris, however, Sigma Octantis can NOT be seen simultaneously from every point along the same latitude, it is NOT central but allegedly 1 degree off-center, it is NOT motionless, and in fact cannot be seen at all using publicly available telescopes! There is legitimate speculation regarding whether Sigma Octantis even exists. Either way, the direction in which stars move overhead is based on perspective and the exact direction you’re facing, not which hemisphere you are in.
102) Some heliocentrists have tried to suggest that the Pole Star’s gradual declination overhead as an observer travels southwards is proof of a globular Earth. Far from it, the declination of the Pole Star or any other object is simply a result of the Law of Perspective on plane (flat) surfaces. The Law of Perspective dictates that the angle and height at which an object is seen diminishes the farther one recedes from the object, until at a certain point the line of sight and the seemingly uprising surface of the Earth converges to a vanishing point (i.e. the horizon line) beyond which the object is invisible. In the ball-Earth model the horizon is claimed to be the curvature of the Earth, whereas in reality, the horizon is known to be simply the vanishing line of perspective based on the strength of your eyes, instruments, weather and altitude.
103) There are several constellations which can be seen from far greater distances over the face of the Earth than should be possible if the world were a rotating, revolving, wobbling ball. For instance, Ursa Major, very close to Polaris, can be seen from 90 degrees North latitude (the North Pole) all the way down to 30 degrees South latitude. For this to be possible on a ball-Earth the Southern observers would have to be seeing through hundreds or thousands of miles of bulging Earth to the Northern sky.
104) The constellation Vulpecula can be seen from 90 degrees North latitude, all the way to 55 degrees South latitude. Taurus, Pisces and Leo can be seen from 90 degrees North all the way to 65 degrees South. An observer on a ball-Earth, regardless of any tilt or inclination, should not logically be able to see this far.
105) Aquarius and Libra can be seen from 65 degrees North to 90 degrees South! The constellation Virgo is visible from 80 degrees North down to 80 degrees South, and Orion can be seen from 85 degrees North all the way to 75 degrees South latitude! These are all only possible because the “hemispheres” are not spheres at all but concentric circles of latitude extending outwards from the central North Pole with the stars rotating over and around.
106) The so-called “South Pole” is simply an arbitrary point along the Antarctic ice marked with a red and white barbershop pole topped with a metal ball-Earth. This ceremonial South Pole is admittedly and provably NOT the actual South Pole, however, because the actual South Pole could be demonstrably confirmed with the aid of a compass showing North to be 360 degrees around the observer. Since this feat has never been achieved, the model remains pure theory, along with the establishment’s excuse that the geomagnetic poles supposedly constantly move around making verification of their claims impossible.
107) Ring magnets of the kind found in loudspeakers have a central North pole with the opposite “South” pole actually being all points along the outer circumference. This perfectly demonstrates the magnetism of our flat Earth, whereas the alleged source of magnetism in the ball-Earth model is emitted from a hypothetical molten magnetic core in the center of the ball which they claim conveniently causes both poles to constantly move thus evading independent verification at their two “ceremonial poles.” In reality the deepest drilling operation in history, the Russian Kola Ultradeep, managed to get only 8 miles down, so the entire ball-Earth model taught in schools showing a crust, outer-mantle, inner-mantle, outer-core and inner-core layers are all purely speculation as we have never penetrated through beyond the crust.
108) The mariner’s compass is an impossible and non-sensical instrument for use on a ball-Earth. It simultaneously points North and South over a flat surface, yet claims to be pin-pointing two constantly moving geomagnetic poles at opposite ends of a spinning sphere originating from a hypothetical molten metal core. If compass needles were actually drawn to the North pole of a globe, the opposing “South” needle would actually be pointing up and off into outer-space.
109) There are no fixed “East” or “West” points just as there is no fixed “South.” The North central Pole is the only proven fixed point on our flat Earth, with South being all straight lines outwards from the pole, East and West being concentric circles at constant right angles 90 degrees from the pole. A westerly circumnavigation of Earth is thus going around with Polaris continually on your right, while an easterly circumnavigation is going around with Polaris always at your left.
110) Magellan and others’ East/West circumnavigations of Earth are often quoted as proof of the ball model. In actual fact, however, sailing or flying at rights angles to the North pole and eventually returning to one’s original location is no more difficult or mysterious than doing so on a globe. Just as an architect’s compass can place its center-point on a flat piece of paper and trace a circle either way around the “pole,” so can a ship or plane circumnavigate a flat-Earth.
111) Since the North Pole and Antarctica are covered in ice and guarded “no-fly” zones, no ships or planes have ever been known to circumnavigate the Earth in North/South directions. The only kind of circumnavigation which could not happen on a flat-Earth is North/Southbound, which is likely the very reason for the heavily-enforced flight restrictions. The fact that there has yet to be a single verified North/South circumnavigation of Earth serves as standing proof the world is not a ball.
112) The Sun brings noon to every time-zone as it passes directly over-head every 15 degree demarcation point, 24 times per day in its circular path over and around the Earth. If time-zones were instead caused by the uniform spinning of the ball-Earth around the Sun, every 6 months as Earth found itself on the opposite side of the Sun, clocks all over Earth would have to flip 12 hours, day would be night and night would be day.
113) The idea that people are standing, ships are sailing and planes are flying upside down on certain parts of Earth while others tilted at 90 degrees and all other impossible angles is complete absurdity. The idea that a man digging a hole straight down could eventually reach sky on the other side is ludicrous. Common sense tells every free-thinking person correctly that there truly is an “up” and “down” in nature, unlike the “everything is relative” rhetoric of the Newtonian/Einsteinian paradigm.
114) Quoting, “On the False Wisdom of the Philosophers” by Lacantius, “A sphere where people on the other side live with their feet above their heads, where rain, snow and hail fall upwards, where trees and crops grow upside-down and the sky is lower than the ground? The ancient wonder of the hanging gardens of Babylon dwindle into nothing in comparison to the fields, seas, towns and mountains that pagan philosophers believe to be hanging from the earth without support!”
115) The existing laws of density and buoyancy perfectly explained the physics of falling objects long before knighted Freemason “Sir” Isaac Newton bestowed his theory of “gravity” upon the world. It is a fact that objects placed in denser mediums rise up while objects placed in less dense mediums sink down. To fit with the heliocentric model which has no up or down, Newton instead claimed objects are attracted to large masses and fall towards the center. Not a single experiment in history, however, has shown an object massive enough to, by virtue of its mass alone, cause other smaller masses to be attracted to it as Newton claims “gravity” does with Earth, the Sun, Moon, Stars and Planets.
116) There has also never been a single experiment in history showing an object massive enough to, by virtue of its mass alone, cause another smaller mass to orbit around it. The magic theory of gravity allows for oceans, buildings and people to remain forever stuck to the underside of a spinning ball while simultaneously causing objects like the Moon and satellites to remain locked in perpetual circular orbits around the Earth. If these were both true then people should be able to jump up and start orbiting circles around the Earth, or the Moon should have long ago been sucked into the Earth. Neither of these theories have ever been experimentally verified and their alleged results are mutually exclusive.
117) Newton also theorized and it is now commonly taught that the Earth’s ocean tides are caused by gravitational lunar attraction. If the Moon is only 2,160 miles in diameter and the Earth 8,000 miles, however, using their own math and “law,” it follows that the Earth is 87 times more massive and therefore the larger object should attract the smaller to it, and not the other way around. If the Earth’s greater gravity is what keeps the Moon in orbit, it is impossible for the Moon’s lesser gravity to supersede the Earth’s gravity, especially at Earth’s sea-level, where its gravitational attraction would even further out-trump the Moon’s. And if the Moon’s gravity truly did supersede the Earth’s causing the tides to be drawn towards it, there should be nothing to stop them from continuing onwards and upwards towards their great attractor.
118) Furthermore, the velocity and path of the Moon are uniform and should therefore exert a uniform influence on the Earth’s tides, when in actuality the Earth’s tides vary greatly and do not follow the Moon. Earth’s lakes, ponds, marshes and other inland bodies of water also inexplicably remain forever outside the Moon’s gravitational grasp! If “gravity” was truly drawing Earth’s oceans up to it, all lakes, ponds and other bodies of standing water should certainly have tides as well.
119) It is claimed that the other planets are spheres and so therefore Earth must also be a sphere. Firstly, Earth is a “plane” not a “planet,” so the shape of these “planets” in the sky have no bearing on the shape of the Earth beneath our feet. Secondly, these “planets” have been known for thousands of years around the world as the “wandering stars” since they differ from the other fixed stars in their relative motions only. When looked at with an unprejudiced naked-eye or through a telescope, the fixed and wandering stars appear as luminous discs of light, NOT spherical terra firma. The pictures and videos shown by NASA of spherical terra firma planets are all clearly fake computer-generated images, and NOT photographs.
120) The etymology of the word “planet” actually comes from late Old English planete, from Old French planete (Modern French planète), from Latin planeta, from Greek planetes, from (asteres) planetai “wandering (stars),” from planasthai “to wander,” of unknown origin, possibly from PIE *pele “flat, to spread” or notion of “spread out.” And Plane (n) “flat surface,” c. 1600, from Latin planum “flat surface, plane, level, plain,” planus “flat, level, even, plain, clear.” They just added a “t” to our Earth plane and everyone bought it.
121) When you observe the Sun and Moon you see two equally-sized equidistant circles tracing similar paths at similar speeds around a flat, stationary Earth. The “experts” at NASA, however, claim your common sense every day experience is false on all counts! To begin with, they say the Earth is not flat but a big ball; not stationary but spinning around 19 miles per second; they say the Sun does not revolve around the Earth as it appears, but Earth revolves around the Sun; the Moon, on the other hand, does revolve around the Earth, though not East to West as it appears, rather West to East; and the Sun is actually 400 times larger than the Moon and 400 times farther away! You can clearly see they are the same size and distance, you can see the Earth is flat, you can feel the Earth is stationary, but according to the gospel of modern astronomy, you are wrong and a simpleton worthy of endless ridicule if you dare to trust your own eyes and experience.
122) Quoting Allen Daves, “If the Government or NASA had said to you that the Earth is stationary, imagine that. And then imagine we are trying to convince people that 'no, no it's not stationary, it's moving forward at 32 times rifle bullet speed and spinning at 1,000 miles per hour.' We would be laughed at! We would have so many people telling us 'you are crazy, the Earth is not moving!' We would be ridiculed for having no scientific backing for this convoluted moving Earth theory. And not only that but then people would say, 'oh then how do you explain a fixed, calm atmosphere and the Sun's observable movement, how do you explain that?' Imagine saying to people, 'no, no, the atmosphere is moving also but is somehow magically velcroed to the moving-Earth. The reason is not simply because the Earth is stationary.' So what we are actually doing is what makes sense. We are saying that the moving-Earth theory is nonsense. The stationary-Earth theory makes sense and we are being ridiculed. You've got to picture it being the other way around to realize just how RIDICULOUS this situation is. This theory from the Government and NASA that the Earth is rotating and orbiting and leaning over and wobbling is absolute nonsense and yet people are clinging to it, tightly, like a teddy bear. They just can't bring themselves to face the possibility that the Earth is stationary though ALL the evidence shows it: we feel no movement, the atmosphere hasn't been blown away, we see the Sun move from East-to-West, everything can be explained by a motionless Earth without bringing in all these assumptions to cover up previous assumptions gone bad.”
123) Heliocentrists’ astronomical figures always sound perfectly precise, but they have historically been notorious for regularly and drastically changing them to suit their various models. For instance, in his time Copernicus calculated the Sun’s distance from Earth to be 3,391,200 miles. The next century Johannes Kepler decided it was actually 12,376,800 miles away. Issac Newton once said, “It matters not whether we reckon it 28 or 54 million miles distant for either would do just as well!” How scientific!? Benjamin Martin calculated between 81 and 82 million miles, Thomas Dilworth claimed 93,726,900 miles, John Hind stated positively 95,298,260 miles, Benjamin Gould said more than 96 million miles, and Christian Mayer thought it was more than 104 million! Flat-Earthers throughout the ages, conversely, have used sextants and plane trigonometry to make such calculations and found the Sun and Moon both to be only about 32 miles in diameter and less than a few thousand miles from Earth.
124) Amateur balloon footage taken above the clouds has provided stunning visual proof that the Sun cannot be millions of miles away. In several shots you can see a clear hot-spot reflecting on the clouds directly below the Sun’s spotlight-like influence. If the Sun were actually millions of miles away such a small, localized hot-spot could not occur.
125) Another proof the Sun is not millions of miles away is found by tracing the angle of sun-rays back to their source above the clouds. There are thousands of pictures showing how sunlight comes down through cloud-cover at a variance of converging angles. The area of convergence is of course the Sun, and is clearly NOT millions of miles away, but rather relatively close to Earth just above the clouds.
126) The Sun’s annual journey from tropic to tropic, solstice to solstice, is what determines the length and character of days, nights and seasons. This is why equatorial regions experience almost year-round summer and heat while higher latitudes North and especially South experience more distinct seasons with harsh winters. The heliocentric model claims seasons change based on the ball-Earth’s alleged “axial tilt” and “elliptical orbit” around the Sun, yet their flawed current model places us closest to the Sun (91,400,000 miles) in January when its actually winter, and farthest from the Sun (94,500,000 miles) in July when its actually summer throughout most of the Earth.
127) The fact that the Sun and Moon’s reflections on water always form a straight line path from the horizon to the observer proves the Earth is not a ball. If Earth’s surface was curved it would be impossible for the reflected light to curve over the ball from horizon to observer.
128) There are huge centuries-old stone sundials and moondials all over the world which still tell the time now down to the minute as perfectly as the day they were made. If the Earth, Sun and Moon were truly subject to the number of contradictory revolving, rotating, wobbling and spiraling motions claimed by modern astronomy, it would be impossible for these monuments to so accurately tell time without constant adjustment.
129) To quote William Carpenter, “Why, in the name of common sense, should observers have to fix their telescopes on solid stone bases so that they should not move a hair's-breadth, - if the Earth on which they fix them moves at the rate of nineteen miles in a second? Indeed, to believe that ‘six thousand million million million tons’ is ‘rolling, surging, flying, darting on through space for ever’ with a velocity compared with which a shot from a cannon is a ‘very slow coach,’ with such unerring accuracy that a telescope fixed on granite pillars in an observatory will not enable a lynx-eyed astronomer to detect a variation in its onward motion of the thousandth part of a hair's-breadth is to conceive a miracle compared with which all the miracles on record put together would sink into utter insignificance. Since we can, (in middle north latitudes), see the North Star, on looking out of a window that faces it - and out of the very same corner of the very same pane of glass in the very same window - all the year round, it is proof enough for any man in his senses that we have made no motion at all and that the Earth is not a globe.”
130) From “Earth Not a Globe!” by Samuel Rowbotham, “Take two carefully-bored metallic tubes, not less than six feet in length, and place them one yard asunder, on the opposite sides of a wooden frame, or a solid block of wood or stone: so adjust them that their centres or axes of vision shall be perfectly parallel to each other. Now, direct them to the plane of some notable fixed star, a few seconds previous to its meridian time. Let an observer be stationed at each tube and the moment the star appears in the first tube let a loud knock or other signal be given, to be repeated by the observer at the second tube when he first sees the same star. A distinct period of time will elapse between the signals given. The signals will follow each other in very rapid succession, but still, the time between is sufficient to show that the same star is not visible at the same moment by two parallel lines of sight when only one yard asunder. A slight inclination of the second tube towards the first tube would be required for the star to be seen through both tubes at the same instant. Let the tubes remain in their position for six months; at the end of which time the same observation or experiment will produce the same results--the star will be visible at the same meridian time, without the slightest alteration being required in the direction of the tubes: from which it is concluded that if the earth had moved one single yard in an orbit through space, there would at least be observed the slight inclination of the tube which the difference in position of one yard had previously required. But as no such difference in the direction of the tube is required, the conclusion is unavoidable, that in six months a given meridian upon the earth's surface does not move a single yard, and therefore, that the earth has not the slightest degree of orbital motion."
131) NASA and modern astronomy maintain that the Moon is a solid, spherical, Earth-like habitation which man has actually flown to and set foot on. They claim the Moon is a non-luminescent planetoid which receives and reflects all its light from the Sun. The reality is, however, that the Moon is observably not a solid body, it is clearly circular, but not spherical, and not in any way an Earth-like planetoid which humans could set foot on. In fact, the Moon has been proven largely transparent and completely self-luminescent, shining with its own unique light.
132) The Sun’s light is golden, warm, drying, preservative and antiseptic, while the Moon’s light is silver, cool, damp, putrefying and septic. The Sun’s rays decrease the combustion of a bonfire, while the Moon’s rays increase combustion. Plant and animal substances exposed to sunlight quickly dry, shrink, coagulate, and lose the tendency to decompose and putrify; grapes and other fruits become solid, partially candied and preserved like raisins, dates, and prunes; animal flesh coagulates, loses its volatile gaseous constituents, becomes firm, dry, and slow to decay. When exposed to moonlight, however, plant and animal substances tend to show symptoms of putrefaction and decay. This proves that Sun and Moon light are different, unique, and opposites as they are in the geocentric flat model.
133) In direct sunlight a thermometer will read higher than another thermometer placed in the shade, but in full, direct moonlight a thermometer will read lower than another placed in the shade. If the Sun’s light is collected in a large lens and thrown to a focus point it can create significant heat, while the Moon’s light collected similarly creates no heat. In the "Lancet Medical Journal,” from March 14th, 1856, particulars are given of several experiments which proved the Moon's rays when concentrated can actually reduce the temperature upon a thermometer more than eight degrees. So sunlight and moonlight clearly have altogether different properties.
134) Furthermore the Moon itself cannot physically be both a spherical body and a reflector of the Sun’s light. Reflectors must be flat or concave for light rays to have any angle of incidence; If a reflector’s surface is convex then every ray of light points in a direct line with the radius perpendicular to the surface resulting in no reflection.
135) Not only is the Moon clearly self-luminescent, shining its own unique light, but it is also largely transparent. When the waxing or waning Moon is visible during the day it is possible to see the blue sky right through the Moon. And on a clear night, during a waxing or waning cycle, it is even possible to occasionally see stars and “planets” directly through the surface of the Moon! The Royal Astronomical Society has on record many such occurrences throughout history which all defy the heliocentric model.
136) Many people think that modern astronomy’s ability to accurately predict lunar and solar eclipses is a result and proof positive of the heliocentric theory of the universe. The fact of the matter however is that eclipses have been accurately predicted by cultures worldwide for thousands of years before the “heliocentric ball-Earth” was even a glimmer in Copernicus’ imagination. Ptolemy in the 1st century A.D. accurately predicted eclipses for six hundred years on the basis of a flat, stationary Earth with equal precision as anyone living today. All the way back in 600 B.C. Thales accurately predicted an eclipse which ended the war between the Medes and Lydians. Eclipses happen regularly with precision in 18 year cycles, so regardless of geocentric or heliocentric, flat or globe Earth cosmologies, eclipses can be accurately calculated independent of such factors.
137) Another assumption and supposed proof of Earth’s shape, heliocentrists claim that lunar eclipses are caused by the shadow of the ball-Earth occulting the Moon. They claim the Sun, Earth, and Moon spheres perfectly align like three billiard balls in a row so that the Sun’s light casts the Earth’s shadow onto the Moon. Unfortunately for heliocentrists, this explanation is rendered completely invalid due to the fact that lunar eclipses have happened and continue to happen regularly when both the Sun and Moon are still visible together above the horizon! For the Sun’s light to be casting Earth’s shadow onto the Moon, the three bodies must be aligned in a straight 180 degree syzygy, but as early as the time of Pliny, there are records of lunar eclipses happening while both the Sun and Moon are visible in the sky. Therefore the eclipsor of the Moon cannot be the Earth/Earth’s shadow and some other explanation must be sought.
138) Another favorite “proof” of ball-Earthers is the appearance from an observer on shore of ships’ hulls being obfuscated by the water and disappearing from view when sailing away towards the horizon. Their claim is that ships’ hulls disappear before their mast-heads because the ship is beginning its declination around the convex curvature of the ball-Earth. Once again, however, their hasty conclusion is drawn from a faulty premise, namely that only on a ball-Earth could this phenomenon occur. The fact of the matter is that the Law of Perspective on plane surfaces dictates and necessitates the exact same occurrence. For example a girl wearing a dress walking away towards the horizon will appear to sink into the Earth the farther away she walks. Her feet will disappear from view first and the distance between the ground and the bottom of her dress will gradually diminish until after about half a mile it seems like her dress is touching the ground as she walks on invisible legs. Such is the case on plane surfaces, the lowest parts of objects receding from a given point of observation necessarily disappear before the highest.
139) Not only is the disappearance of ship’s hulls explained by the Law of Perspective on flat surfaces, it is proven undeniably true with the aid of a good telescope. If you watch a ship sailing away into the horizon with the naked eye until its hull has completely disappeared from view under the supposed “curvature of the Earth,” then look through a telescope, you will notice the entire ship quickly zooms back into view, hull and all, proving that the disappearance was caused by the Law of Perspective, not by a wall of curved water! This also proves that the horizon is simply the vanishing line of perspective from your point of view, NOT the alleged “curvature” of Earth.
140) Foucault’s Pendulums are often quoted as proof of a rotating Earth but upon closer investigation prove the opposite. To begin with, Foucault’s pendulums do not uniformly swing in any one direction. Sometimes they rotate clockwise and sometimes counter-clockwise, sometimes they fail to rotate and sometimes they rotate far too much. The behavior of the pendulum actually depends on 1) the initial force beginning its swing and, 2) the ball-and-socket joint used which most-readily facilitates circular motion over any other. The supposed rotation of the Earth is completely inconsequential and irrelevant to the pendulum’s swing. If the alleged constant rotation of the Earth affected pendulums in any way, then there should be no need to manually start pendulums in motion. If the Earth’s diurnal rotation caused the 360 degree uniform diurnal rotation of pendulums, then there should not exist a stationary pendulum anywhere on Earth!
141) The “Coriolis Effect” is often said to cause sinks and toilet bowls in the Northern Hemisphere to drain spinning in one direction while in the Southern Hemisphere causing them to spin the opposite way, thus providing proof of the spinning ball-Earth. Once again, however, just like Foucault’s Pendulums spinning either which way, sinks and toilets in the Northern and Southern hemispheres do not consistently spin in any one direction! Sinks and toilets in the very same household are often found to spin opposite directions, depending entirely upon the shape of the basin and the angle of the water’s entry, not the supposed rotation of the Earth.
142) People claim that if the Earth were flat, they should be able to use a telescope and see clear across the oceans! This is absurd, however, as the air is full of precipitation especially over the oceans, and especially at the lowest, densest layer of atmosphere is NOT transparent. Picture the blurry haze over roads on hot, humid days. Even the best telescope will blur out long before you could see across an ocean. You can, however, use a telescope to zoom in MUCH more of our flat Earth than would be possible on a ball 25,000 miles in circumference.
143) People claim that if the Earth were flat, with the Sun circling over and around us, we should be able to see the Sun from everywhere all over the Earth, and there should be daylight even at night-time. Since the Sun is NOT 93 million miles away but rather just a few thousand and shining down like a spotlight, once it has moved significantly far enough away from your location it becomes invisible beyond the horizon and daylight slowly fades until it completely disappears. If the Sun were 93 million miles away and the Earth a spinning ball, the transition from daylight to night would instead be almost instantaneous as you passed the terminator line.
144) Pictures of the Moon appearing upside-down in the Southern hemisphere and right-side up in the North are often cited as proof of the ball-Earth, but once again, upon closer inspection, provide another proof of the flat model. In fact, time-lapse photography shows the Moon itself turns clockwise like a wheel as it circles over and around the Earth. You can find pictures of the Moon at 360 degrees of various inclination from all over the Earth simply depending on where and when the picture was taken.
145) Heliocentrists believe the Moon is a ball, even though its appearance is clearly that of a flat luminous disc. We only ever see the same one face (albeit at various inclinations) of the Moon, yet it is claimed that there is another “dark side of the Moon” which remains hidden. NASA states the Moon spins opposite the spin of the Earth in such a perfectly synchronized way that the motions cancel each other out so we will conveniently never be able to observe the supposed dark-side of the Moon outside of their terrible fake CGI images. The fact of the matter is, however, if the Moon were a sphere, observers in Antarctica would see a different face from those at the equator, yet they do not – just the same flat face rotated at various degrees.
146) The ball-Earth model claims the Moon orbits around the Earth once every 28 days, yet it is plain for anyone to see that the Moon orbits around the Earth every single day! The Moon’s orbit is slightly slower than the Sun’s, but follows the Sun’s same path from Tropic to Tropic, solstice to solstice, making a full circle over the Earth in just under 25 hours.
147) The ball-Earth model claims the Sun is precisely 400 times larger than the Moon and 400 times further away from Earth making them “falsely” appear exactly the same size. Once again, the ball model asks us to accept as coincidence something that cannot be explained other than by natural design. The Sun and the Moon occupy the same amount of space in the sky and have been measured with sextants to be of equal size and equal distance, so claiming otherwise is against our eyes, experience, experiments and common sense.
148) Quoting “Earth Not a Globe!” by Samuel Rowbotham, “It is found by observation that the stars come to the meridian about four minutes earlier every twenty-four hours than the sun, taking the solar time as the standard. This makes 120 minutes every thirty days, and twenty-four hours in the year. Hence all the constellations have passed before or in advance of the sun in that time. This is the simple fact as observed in nature, but the theory of rotundity and motion on axes and in an orbit has no place for it. Visible truth must be ignored, because this theory stands in the way, and prevents its votaries from understanding it.”
149) Throughout thousands of years the same constellations have remained fixed in their same patterns without moving out of position whatsoever. If the Earth were a big ball spinning around a bigger Sun spinning around a bigger galaxy shooting off from the Biggest Bang as NASA claims, it is impossible that the constellations would remain so fixed. Based on their model, we should, in fact, have an entirely different night sky every single night and never repeat exactly the same star pattern twice.
150) If Earth were a spinning ball it would be impossible to photograph star-trail time-lapses turning perfect circles around Polaris anywhere but the North Pole. At all other vantage points the stars would be seen to travel more or less horizontally across the observer’s horizon due to the alleged 1000mph motion beneath their feet. In reality, however, Polaris’s surrounding stars can always be photographed turning perfect circles around the central star all the way down to the Tropic of Capricorn.
151) If Earth were a spinning ball revolving around the Sun it would actually be impossible for star-trail photos to show perfect circles even at the North Pole! Since the Earth is also allegedly moving 67,000mph around the Sun, the Sun moving 500,000mph around the Milky Way, and the entire galaxy going 670,000,000mph, these four contradictory motions would make star-trail time-lapses all show irregular curved lines.
152) In 2003, three University Geography professors collaborated in an experiment to prove that the state of Kansas is indeed actually flatter than a pancake! Using topigraphical geodetic surveys covering over 80,000 square miles it was determined that Kansas has a flatness ratio of 0.9997 over the entire state while the average pancake, precisely measured using a confocal laser microscope comes in at 0.957, making Kansas thereby literally flatter than a pancake.
153) Quoting Reverend Thomas Milner’s “Atlas of Physical Geography,” we find that, “Vast areas exhibit a perfectly dead level, scarcely a rise existing through 1,500 miles from the Carpathians to the Urals. South of the Baltic the country is so flat that a prevailing north wind will drive the waters of the Stattiner Haf into the mouth of the Oder, and give the river a backward flow 30 or 40 miles. The plains of Venezuela and New Granada, in South America chiefly on the left of the Orinoco, are termed Ilanos, or level fields. Often in the space of 270 square miles the surface does not vary a single foot. The Amazon only falls 12 feet in the last 700 miles of its course; the La Plata has only a descent of one thirty-third of an inch a mile.”
154) The Felix Baumgartner Red Bull dive outside camera shows the same amount of “curvature of Earth” from surface-level to jump-height proving it to be a deceiving fish-eyed wide-angle lens, while the inside regular camera shows a perfectly flat horizon, eye level at 128,000 feet, which is only consistent with a flat plane.
155) Some people claim to have seen the curvature of the Earth out their airplane windows. The glass used in all commercial airplanes, however, is curved to remain flush with the fuselage. This creates a slight effect mixed with confirmation bias people mistake for being the alleged curvature of the Earth. In actuality, the fact that you can see the horizon at eye-level at 35,000 feet out both port/starboard windows proves the Earth is flat. If the Earth were a ball, no matter how big, the horizon would stay exactly where it was and you would have to look DOWN further and further to see the horizon at all. Looking straight out the window at 35,000 feet you should see nothing but "outer-space" from the port and starboard windows, as the Earth/horizon are supposed to be BELOW you. If they are visible at eye level outside both side windows, it’s because the Earth is flat!
156) People also claim to see curvature in Go Pro or other high altitude camera footage of the horizon. While it is true that the horizon often appears convex in such footage, it just as often appears concave or flat depending on the tilt/movement of the camera. The effect is simply a distortion due to wide-angle lenses. In lens-corrected and footage taken without wide-angle technology, all amateur high-altitude horizon shots appear perfectly flat.
157) If “gravity” magically dragged the atmosphere along with the spinning ball Earth, that would mean the atmosphere near the equator would be spinning around at over 1000mph, the atmosphere over the mid-latitudes would be spinning around 500mph, and gradually slower down to the poles where the atmosphere would be unaffected at 0mph. In reality, however, the atmosphere at every point on Earth is equally unaffected by this alleged force, as it has never been measured or calculated and proven non-existent by the ability of airplanes to fly unabated in any direction without experiencing any such atmospheric changes.
158) If “gravity” magically dragged the atmosphere along with the spinning ball Earth, that would mean the higher the altitude, the faster the spinning atmosphere would have to be turning around the center of rotation. In reality, however, if this were happening then rain and fireworks would behave entirely differently as they fell down through progressively slower and slower spinning atmosphere. Hot-air balloons would also be forced steadily faster Eastwards as they ascended through the ever increasing atmospheric speeds.
159) If there were progressively faster and faster spinning atmosphere the higher the altitude that would mean it would have to abruptly end at some key altitude where the fastest layer of gravitized spinning atmosphere meets the supposed non-gravitized non-spinning non-atmosphere of infinite vacuum space! NASA has never mentioned what altitude this impossible feat allegedly happens, but it is easily philosophically refuted by the simple fact that vacuums cannot exist connected to non-vacuums while maintaining the properties of a vacuum – not to mention, the effect such a transition would have on a rocket “space ship” would be disastrous.
160) It is impossible for rockets or any type of jet propulsion engines to work in the alleged non-atmosphere of vacuum space because without air/atmosphere to push against there is nothing to propel the vehicle forwards. Instead the rockets and shuttles would be sent spinning around their own axis uncontrollably in all directions like a gyroscope. It would be impossible to fly to the Moon or go in any direction whatsoever, especially if “gravity” were real and constantly sucking you towards the closest densest body.
161) If Earth were really a ball, there would be no reason to use rockets for flying into “outer-space” anyway because simply flying an airplane straight at any altitude for long enough should and would send you off into outer-space. To prevent their airplanes from flying tangent to the ball-Earth, pilots would have to constantly course-correct downwards, or else within just a few hours the average commercial airliner traveling 500mph would find themselves lost in “outer-space.” The fact that this never happens, artificial horizons remain level at pilot’s desired altitudes and do NOT require constant downwards adjustments, proves the Earth is not a ball.
162) All NASA and other “space agencies” rocket launches never go straight up. Every rocket forms a parabolic curve, peaks out, and inevitably starts falling back to Earth. The rockets which are declared “successful” are those few which don’t explode or start falling too soon but make it out of range of spectator view before crashing down into restricted waters and recovered. There is no magic altitude where rockets or anything else can simply go up, up, up and then suddenly just start “free-floating” in space. This is all a science-fiction illusion created by wires, green-screens, dark pools, some permed hair and Zero-G planes.
163) NASA and other space agencies have been caught time and again with air bubbles forming and floating off in their official “outer-space” footage. Astronauts have also been caught using scuba-space-gear, kicking their legs to move, and astronaut Luca Parmitano even almost drowned when water started filling up his helmet while allegedly on a “space-walk.” It is admitted that astronauts train for their “space-walks” in under-water training facilities like NASA’s “Neutral Buoyancy Lab,” but what is obvious from their “space bubbles,” and other blunders is that all official “space-walk” footage is also fake and filmed under-water.
164) Analysis of many interior videos from the “International Space Station,” have shown the use of camera-tricks such as green-screens, harnesses and even wildly permed hair to achieve a zero-gravity type effect. Footage of astronauts seemingly floating in the zero-gravity of their “space station” is indistinguishable from “vomit comet” Zero-G airplane footage. By flying parabolic maneuvers this Zero-G floating effect can be achieved over and over again then edited together. For longer uncut shots, NASA has been caught using simple wires and green screen technology.
165) NASA claims one can observe the International Space Station pass by overhead proving its existence, yet analysis of the “ISS” seen through zoom cameras proves it to be some type of hologram/drone, not a physical floating space-base. As you can see in my documentary “ISS Hoax,” when zooming in/out, the “ISS” dramatically and impossibly changes shape and color, displaying a prismatic rainbow effect until coming into focus much like an old television turning on/off.
166) The “geostationary communications satellite” was first created by Freemason science-fiction writer Arthur C. Clarke and supposedly became science-fact just a decade later. Before this, radio, television, and navigation systems like LORAN and DECCA were already well-established and worked fine using only ground-based technologies. Nowadays huge fibre-optics cables connect the internet across oceans, gigantic cell towers triangulate GPS signals, and ionospheric propagation allows radio waves to be bounced all without the aid of the science-fiction best-seller known as “satellites.”
167) Satellites are allegedly floating around in the thermosphere where temperatures are claimed to be upwards of 4,530 degrees Fahrenheit. The metals used in satellites, however, such as aluminum, gold and titanium have melting points of 1,221, 1,948, and 3,034 degrees respectively, all far lower than they could possibly handle.
168) So-called “satellite” phones have been found to have reception problems in countries like Kazakhstan with very few cell phone towers. If the Earth were a ball with 20,000+ satellites surrounding, such blackouts should not regularly occur in any rural countryside areas.
169) So-called “satellite” TV dishes are almost always positioned at a 45 degree angle towards the nearest ground-based repeater tower. If TV antennae were actually picking up signals from satellites 100+ miles in space, most TV dishes should be pointing more or less straight up to the sky. The fact that “satellite” dishes are never pointing straight up and almost always positioned at a 45 degree angle proves they are picking up ground-based tower signals and not “outer-space satellites.”
170) People even claim to see satellites with their naked eyes, but this is ridiculous considering they are smaller than a bus and allegedly 100+ miles away; It is impossible to see anything so small that far away. Even using telescopes, no one claims to discern the shape of satellites but rather describes seeing passing moving lights, which could easily be any number of things from airplanes to drones to shooting stars or other unidentified flying objects.
171) NASA claims there are upwards of 20,000 satellites floating around Earth’s upper-atmosphere sending us radio, television, GPS, and taking pictures of the planet. All these supposed satellite pictures, however, are admittedly “composite images, edited in photoshop!” They claim to receive “ribbons of imagery” from satellites which must then be spliced together to create composite images of the Earth, all of which are clearly CGI and not photographs. If Earth were truly a ball with 20,000 satellites orbiting, it would be a simple matter to mount a camera and take some real photographs. The fact that no real satellite photographs of the supposed ball Earth exist in favor of NASA’s “ribbons of composite CG imagery,” is further proof we are not being told the truth.
172) If you pick any cloud in the sky and watch for several minutes, two things will happen: the clouds will move and they will morph gradually changing shape. In official NASA footage of the spinning ball Earth, such as the “Galileo” time-lapse video however, clouds are constantly shown for 24+ hours at a time and not moving or morphing whatsoever! This is completely impossible, further proof that NASA produces fake CGI videos, and further evidence that Earth is not a spinning ball.
173) NASA has several alleged photographs of the ball-Earth which show several exact duplicate cloud patterns! The likelihood of having two or three clouds of the exact same shape in the same picture is as likely as finding two or three people with exactly the same fingerprints. In fact it is solid proof that the clouds were copied and pasted in a computer program and that such pictures showing a ball-shaped Earth are fakes.
174) NASA graphics artists have placed things like faces, dragons, and even the word “SEX” into cloud patterns over their various ball-Earth pictures. Their recent 2015 Pluto pictures even clearly have a picture of Disney’s “Pluto” the dog layered into the background. Such blatant fraud goes unnoticed by the hypnotized masses, but provides further proof of the illegitimacy of NASA and their spinning ball planet mythos.
175) Professional photo-analysts have dissected several NASA images of the ball-Earth and found undeniable proof of computer editing. For example, images of the Earth allegedly taken from the Moon have proven to be copied and pasted in, as evidenced by rectangular cuts found in the black background around the “Earth” by adjusting brightness and contrast levels. If they were truly on the Moon and Earth was truly a ball, there would be no need to fake such pictures.
176) When NASA’s images of the ball-Earth are compared with one another the coloration of the land/oceans and relative size of the continents are consistently so drastically different from one another as to prove beyond any reasonable doubt that the pictures are all fake.